Is deliberate hypotension a safe technique for orthopedic surgery?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of parallel randomized controlled trials

Abstract

BackgroundDeliberate hypotension has been shown to reduce the intraoperative bleeding and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion, and improve the surgical field, but there is still controversy on its clinical safety. This systematic review was designed to assess the safety and benefits of deliberate hypotension for orthopedic surgery.MethodsThe review met the requirements of the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, vip citation database, and updated version of China Biology Medicine disc from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019) were searched. All parallel randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of using deliberate hypotension with not using deliberate hypotension on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were selected. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes were the intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, and serious adverse postoperative events.ResultsA total of 30 studies with 36 comparisons (1454 participants) were included in meta-analysis. Two studies with 120 participants reported overall mortality and the result was zero (low-quality evidence). The use of deliberate hypotension reduced the intraoperative blood loss (mean difference, − 376.7; 95% CI − 428.1 to − 325.3; I2 = 94%; 29 studies, 36 comparisons, and 1398 participants; low-quality evidence) and blood transfusion volume (mean difference, − 242.5; 95% CI − 302.5 to − 182.6; I2 = 95%; 13 studies, 14 comparisons, and 544 participants; low-quality evidence). Six studies with 286 participants reported the occurrence of serious adverse postoperative events and the result was zero (low-quality evidence). Subgroup analyses according to age groups, controlled mean artery pressure levels, types of orthopedic surgeries, different combinations of other blood conservative method, and hypotensive methods mostly did not explain heterogeneity; significant differences were identified in almost all subgroups.ConclusionsBased on the available evidence, it is still unclear whether or not deliberate hypotension is a safe technique for orthopedic surgery due to limited studies with very small sample size, though it may decrease the intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion volume irrespective of age groups, controlled mean artery pressure levels, types of surgeries, hypotensive methods, or different combinations of other blood conservation strategies.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016045480.

Effects of nitroglycerin versus labetalol on peripheral perfusion during deliberate hypotension for sinus endoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial

“…The "art" of hypotensive anesthesia is to achieve proper surgical conditions without suppressing perfusion of vital organs [1]. The risk for impairment of tissue perfusion has been the primary concern that limits the use of deliberate hypotension [23]. However, in our patients, we found that PPI did not decrease in the nitroglycerin group throughout the operation, despite the low blood pressure.…”

Controlled hypotension during neuraxial anesthesia is not associated with increased odds of in-hospital common severe medical complications in patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty – A retrospective case control study

“…In contrast, controlled hypotension during neuraxial anesthesia for joint arthroplasty is usually associated with different pathophysiology. However, its application in orthopedic surgery remains controversial [ 10 ]. Our institution has been practicing neuraxial anesthesia-induced intraoperative controlled hypotension (IOCH) for more than 30 years [ 4 ] with lower blood pressure thresholds in each given case determined at the discretion of the surgeon and anesthesiologist.…”

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Blood Control in Lumbar Spine Tumor Resection Surgery: A Technical Note

“…Several interventions including deliberate hypotension, the use of antifibrinolytic and preoperative embolization, has been studied in an attempt to minimize the intraoperative bleeding 4,6,7 . Of these methods, super‐selective embolization was considered an optimal technique for blood control in spinal tumor surgery.…”