2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-002-0427-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis well managed in oncological clinical practice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CINV is considered to be one of the most severe and feared adverse effects of cancer treatment by patients and can have a significant impact on QOL. 370,[374][375][376] Standard of care antiemetics for managing CINV have changed considerably in the last 5 years, thus many of the trials evaluating integrative approaches are not tested with the newest and most effective standard treatment regimen. 197,371 Most contemporary studies use as the endpoint the proportion of patients achieving a complete response, defined as no emesis or use of rescue medication.…”
Section: Yoga (B Grade)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CINV is considered to be one of the most severe and feared adverse effects of cancer treatment by patients and can have a significant impact on QOL. 370,[374][375][376] Standard of care antiemetics for managing CINV have changed considerably in the last 5 years, thus many of the trials evaluating integrative approaches are not tested with the newest and most effective standard treatment regimen. 197,371 Most contemporary studies use as the endpoint the proportion of patients achieving a complete response, defined as no emesis or use of rescue medication.…”
Section: Yoga (B Grade)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 43% of patients treated with highly emetogenic cytotoxic, 64% of patients treated with moderately emetogenic cytotoxicity, and 31% of the patients treated with low-emetogenic cytotoxic agents received the correct antiemetic treatment for delayed-type vomiting. Moreover, 68% of the patients received unnecessary antiemetic treatment [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in stark contrast to what has been observed in the literature where adherence to delayed CINV prophylaxis has been reported to be poor [58, 21]. The utilized system minimizes the need for most providers to independently consider the specific combination and dosing of antiemetics for each chemotherapy regimen and decreases the underuse of antiemetic prophylaxis for both acute and delayed CINV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%