2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is decreased generalized immunity a cost of Bt resistance in cabbage loopers Trichoplusia ni?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
30
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(54 reference statements)
8
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our dataset, two prophenoloxydases (PPO, involved in melanization) and four genes coding for anti-microbial peptides were significantly under-transcribed in the LiTOX strain (table 2), and none were over-transcribed. In line with this, the basal immunity of a Bt-resistant cabbage looper line was shown to be lower than its susceptible counterpart [14], and we also observed a lower basal immunity in strains selected with Bti-toxins as compared with the susceptible strain (data not shown). This suggests that the depressed immunity observed in Bt-resistant insects is explained by the high cost of expression of immune genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our dataset, two prophenoloxydases (PPO, involved in melanization) and four genes coding for anti-microbial peptides were significantly under-transcribed in the LiTOX strain (table 2), and none were over-transcribed. In line with this, the basal immunity of a Bt-resistant cabbage looper line was shown to be lower than its susceptible counterpart [14], and we also observed a lower basal immunity in strains selected with Bti-toxins as compared with the susceptible strain (data not shown). This suggests that the depressed immunity observed in Bt-resistant insects is explained by the high cost of expression of immune genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the molecular bases of the Bt toxin-mediated induction are not known, possible causes may involve signaling functions of Bt toxin (23) or toxin-mediated damage to gut lining, and contact of gut-derived elicitors with hemolymph, including enterobacteria (3), which enhance the induction and toxicity but are not obligatory to toxicity (13). Whatever the mechanism, gut-derived toxin has multiple effects in hemolymph, such as the reduction of hemolymph proteins and an increase in PPO and the number of circulating hemocytes (6), as well as a reduction in hemocyte phagocytosis (5) and an increase in PO-inhibiting proteins (7). These data suggest that induction of the immune defense by gut-derived elicitors generates a wide range of metabolic responses that includes defense reactions against an intruding toxin or pathogen and also downregulation of the insect's own defense responses, such as coagulation and melanization, that are potentially damaging if allowed to spread within the hemocoel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inoculation thus rendered the internal larval environment conducive to massive multiplication of enteric bacteria. B. thuringiensis is known to alter the host's innate immune response by affecting both humoral and cellular factors (Dubovskiy et al, 2008a,b;Ericsson et al, 2009), possibly giving rise to a concomitant increase in enteric bacterial populations in certain hosts. The pattern of increase relative to progression of larval mortality, including a possible leveling off after completion of mortality (96 h p.i.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%