2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00163-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is decompressive craniectomy for acute cerebral infarction of any benefit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
2
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
42
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In several studies, age appeared as a negative predicting factor for favourable outcome. Several authors concluded that the mean age of the group with unfavourable outcome was 56.6 years [6,9,11,12]. Our study did not support this data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…In several studies, age appeared as a negative predicting factor for favourable outcome. Several authors concluded that the mean age of the group with unfavourable outcome was 56.6 years [6,9,11,12]. Our study did not support this data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…There is no reported definite documentation in the current literature regarding the results of DS for such patients, except case reports including the patients with head injury or CVA. [21][22][23][24] Nevertheless, the question may be raised whether the lack of demonstrable efficacy of DS in our patient study group was due to the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussion Causes Of Pupillary Dilation In Patients Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 If a cerebellar infarction produces a mass effect with signs of brainstem compression or herniation, a surgical decompressive procedure may be necessary in such patients. 24,25 Although reported strokes associated with marijuana use are few, marijuana use may represent a genuine risk factor for stroke, especially in the adolescent and particularly in the cerebellar circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%