"Is Cybermedicine Killing You?" - Codes of Ethics for Journalists

Finer, David

doi:10.2196/jmir.7.4.e45

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Future work might consider different cultures, different mass media or different analysis tools. The mass media in some cultures might systematically treat retractions differently than the media in other cultures 34 . Web coverage of retractions may differ from paper coverage in significant ways.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mass media in some cultures might systematically treat retractions differently than the media in other cultures. 34 Web coverage of retractions may differ from paper coverage in significant ways. Automated natural language processing tools (including something as simple as a counter of word length of an article) could extract from newspaper stories, press releases and retracted publications their attributes, and those attributes might reveal interesting patterns.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Retractions, press releases and newspaper coverage

Rada

2007

Health Info Libraries J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives : To explore how often newspapers cover the retraction of a medical journal article and whether newspaper coverage corresponds with the appearance of a press release about the retraction. Methods : Fifty citations were identified in PubMed that had been indexed with the Medical Subject Heading 'Retracted Publication'. Next, the archives of LexisNexis's 'Major Newspapers' and EurekAlert's press releases were searched to find references to those retracted publications. Results : Newspaper articles addressed exactly three of the 50 retracted publications, and press releases, exactly four of the 50 retracted publications. All three retracted publications that received newspaper coverage also had a press release. In other words, newspapers only covered a retraction that had been introduced by a press release. Conclusion : One would expect that newspaper coverage would increase after a press release, but the suggested relationships among a medical journal article retraction, a press release and newspaper coverage should be further investigated. If the linkage suggested by the data of this study holds, and if newspaper coverage stimulates library patron interest, then a medical library might prepare itself for information requests following a press release. IntroductionRetracted medical publications represent a serious problem. Various types of error of an author lead to a retraction, 1,2 and mistakes are more common than misconduct. 3 Yet, substantial misconduct occurs, despite warnings to authors, 4 and the effects of scientific misconduct can be devastating. 5 Publishers' reaction to evidence of its authors publishing fraudulent material is mixed. 6 Most publications do not provide a policy on retractions. 7 The American National Library of Medicine introduced the 'Retracted Publication' tag in the 1980s. 8 Nevertheless, authors often continue to cite a retracted article without recognizing that the article was retracted. 9 Retraction notices themselves vary widely in style and scope. 10 The delay between a publication appearing and its retraction has deleterious effects. 11 Not adequately addressed is the relationship between retractions and the mass media. The media exploit scientific breakdowns. 12 British medical newspaper journalists select stories based on media and political agendas. 13 While the study of British newspapers concluded that medical journalists rely on major medical journals for source material, 13 a study of international newspapers suggested that press releases provide the primary source material. 14 Press releases themselves do not routinely highlight study limitations or the role of industry funding, and they exaggerate the perceived importance of findings. 15 One study of Australian television coverage of medical issues has shown that news coverage falls into these categories: bizarre stories, moral warnings, Correspondence: Roy F. Rada, Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA. E-mail: rada@...

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%