2015
DOI: 10.3390/soc5010171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Cyberbullying a Stand Alone Construct? Using Quantitative Analysis to Evaluate a 21st Century Social Question

Abstract: Using a subsample of the 2009 National Crime Victimization Survey, School Crime Supplement (NCVS-SCS), the present study explores the nature of the relationship between cyberbullying and traditional bullying victimization among students aged 12-18. One question of particular interest in the recent cyberbullying literature regards the classification of cyberbullying relative to traditional school yard bullying. As is the case in the cyber victimization literature in general, the question has become whether cybe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With reference to cyberbullying, the physical and temporal separation between the bully and the victim changes both the bullying behaviors themselves as well as the psychological mechanisms through which harm is inflicted on the victim. These differences between traditional and cyberbullying are still the source of scholarly debate as to the classification of cyberbullying (e.g., Randa, Nobles, & Reyns, 2015). Yet, the core of these accepted bullying definitions can essentially be retained and adapted to cyberbullying.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to cyberbullying, the physical and temporal separation between the bully and the victim changes both the bullying behaviors themselves as well as the psychological mechanisms through which harm is inflicted on the victim. These differences between traditional and cyberbullying are still the source of scholarly debate as to the classification of cyberbullying (e.g., Randa, Nobles, & Reyns, 2015). Yet, the core of these accepted bullying definitions can essentially be retained and adapted to cyberbullying.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…innym, a jak zaznaczają E. Menesini i A. Nocentini pośrednia natura cyberprzemocy utrudnia ocenę intencjonalnego lub reaktywnego charakteru ataku 12 . Większość definicji cyberbullyingu interpretuje to zjawisko, jako przemoc w cyberprzestrzeni 13 . Zachowania związane z przemocą internetową obejmują te same sytuacje, które występują w przypadku "zwyczajnego" nękania i objawiają się w postaci gróźb i obelg, wysyłanych za pośrednictwem różnych środków komunikacji na odległość.…”
Section: Pojęcie Cyberprzemocyunclassified
“…Making cyberbullying or cyberbullying in different ways via mobile phones, on the internet or through web sites is as easy as bullying in traditional settings (Calısgan, 2013). Traditional bullying is defined as acts of physical or verbal aggression that are repeated to disgrace the victim Randa, Nobles & Reyns, 2015). Exposure to traditional bullying and grievance, loneliness, peer rejection, low self-esteem, lack of mental well-being, psychological and physiological disturbances seem to be linked (Hinduja & Patchin, 2010).…”
Section: The Cyber Bullying and Traditional Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%