2014
DOI: 10.1111/geer.12052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform

Abstract: According to the literature on traditional banking, lenders often discriminate against female borrowers. However, studies of peer-to-peer lending in the United States find that female borrowers have better chances of obtaining funds than do males. We provide evidence on the success of female borrowers at a large German peer-to-peer lending platform. Our results show that there is no effect of gender on the individual borrower's chance to receive funds on this platform, ceteris paribus. Several robustness check… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
101
2
Order By: Relevance
“…See Beaulieu, Sarker, and Sarker (2015) and Moritz and Block (2016) for a general discussion of crowdfunding. and attractiveness (Barasinska and Schäfer 2014;Gonzalez and Loureiro 2014;Pope and Sydnor 2011;Ravina et al 2008). Mollick (2014) considered the underlying dynamics of success or failure among crowdfunded ventures.…”
Section: Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Beaulieu, Sarker, and Sarker (2015) and Moritz and Block (2016) for a general discussion of crowdfunding. and attractiveness (Barasinska and Schäfer 2014;Gonzalez and Loureiro 2014;Pope and Sydnor 2011;Ravina et al 2008). Mollick (2014) considered the underlying dynamics of success or failure among crowdfunded ventures.…”
Section: Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, their analysis confirmed a clear pattern of women investors preferring women-led projects, indicating that women entrepreneurs indeed may profit from new funding trends. This is illustrated by other studies, demonstrating that gender differences seem to be overcome by the "wisdom of the lending crowd" (Barasinska and Schäfer 2014). Gorbatai and Nelson (2015) suggest that the communication style and language of crowdfunding platforms favour women, again pointing to the need to apply different research techniques which allow us to analyse the gendered impact of hitherto neglected factors influencing access to finance, such as language and individual sense-making.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, some studies using data from the largest peer-to-peer lending platform -Proper.com -show that borrowers who appear more trustworthy or more beautiful have higher probabilities of obtaining a loan and paying lower interest rates (Duarte et al, 2012;Ravina, 2012), and female borrowers are more likely to obtain funds than male borrowers (Pope and Sydnor, 2011). Meanwhile, research with the largest German peer-to-peer lending platform -Smava -finds that there is no effect of gender on an individual borrower's chance of receiving funds (Barasinska and Schäfer, 2014).…”
Section: Lending-based Crowdfundingmentioning
confidence: 99%