2010
DOI: 10.3386/w15733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Credit Event Risk Priced? Modeling Contagion via the Updating of Beliefs.

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such setups arise, e.g., in the presence of counterparty risk (as in Kusuoka (1999) and Jarrow and Yu (2001)) or contagion (as in Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003)). …”
Section: Default Risk Premiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such setups arise, e.g., in the presence of counterparty risk (as in Kusuoka (1999) and Jarrow and Yu (2001)) or contagion (as in Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003)). …”
Section: Default Risk Premiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Cases in which the doubly stochastic setting no longer holds are studied in Duffie, Schroder, and Skiadas (1996), Kusuoka (1999), Jarrow and Yu (2001), Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003) and to the assumption inherent in the Cox process setup that the filtration generated by the default components is conditionally independent of the default event, there do not exist feedback effects from the default time into the default components to be considered in the valuation.…”
Section: Default Risk Premiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jorion and Zhang (2007) conduct a larger scale analysis over bankruptcies and find similar results. The reason for these seemingly unrelated firms sharing a default factor can be learning, as argued by Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Helwege (2003) and Giesecke (2004) or market structure as argued by Allen and Carletti (2006).…”
Section: Frailty Correlated Default Model and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kusuoka (1999), Duffie & Lando (2001), Giesecke (2004), Jarrow & Protter (2004), Giesecke (2004), Coculescu, Geman, & Jeanblanc (2008) and Frey & Schmidt (2006) are concerned with structural models where the value of assets and/or liabilities is not directly observable. Reduced form credit risk models with incomplete information such as our paper have been considered by Schönbucher (2004), Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein & Helwege (2003) and Duffie, Eckner, Horel & Saita (2006). The structure of the latter three models is relatively similar: default intensities are driven by an unobservable factor (process) X; given information about X, the default times are conditionally independent, doubly stochastic random times; finally, the investor information (F I t ) is given by the default history of the portfolio, augmented by economic covariates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%