2009
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.831.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Consumer Preference for Apple Driven Only by Fruit Quality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the specifi c quality traits may differ among fruits, for most fruits the most important traits are fl avor, most commonly measured as total soluble solids and titratable acidity and texture, measured as fi rmness, crispiness, and/or juiciness (Poole and Baron 1996 ;Racskó et al 2009 ;Kajikawa 1998 ;Crisosto et al 2003Crisosto et al , 2006Crisosto et al , 2007Crisosto et al 2004 ;Crisosto and Crisosto 2005 ;Péneau et al 2006 ;Harker et al 2008 ;Turner et al 2008 ) . Common complaints for fruit would be the lack of fl avor and mealy fl esh without juice as seen in stone fruit with internal breakdown (Crisosto et al 1999 ;Peace et al 2005a, b ) and in apples (Jaeger et al 1998 ;Racskó et al 2009 ) .…”
Section: Consistent High Fruit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the specifi c quality traits may differ among fruits, for most fruits the most important traits are fl avor, most commonly measured as total soluble solids and titratable acidity and texture, measured as fi rmness, crispiness, and/or juiciness (Poole and Baron 1996 ;Racskó et al 2009 ;Kajikawa 1998 ;Crisosto et al 2003Crisosto et al , 2006Crisosto et al , 2007Crisosto et al 2004 ;Crisosto and Crisosto 2005 ;Péneau et al 2006 ;Harker et al 2008 ;Turner et al 2008 ) . Common complaints for fruit would be the lack of fl avor and mealy fl esh without juice as seen in stone fruit with internal breakdown (Crisosto et al 1999 ;Peace et al 2005a, b ) and in apples (Jaeger et al 1998 ;Racskó et al 2009 ) .…”
Section: Consistent High Fruit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common complaints for fruit would be the lack of fl avor and mealy fl esh without juice as seen in stone fruit with internal breakdown (Crisosto et al 1999 ;Peace et al 2005a, b ) and in apples (Jaeger et al 1998 ;Racskó et al 2009 ) . Aroma, although important, is diffi cult to measure and external qualities, such as shape, color, and size, which are easily standardized during packing, are usually of secondary importance to fl avor and texture.…”
Section: Consistent High Fruit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure 4.5, relatively higher mean scores for freshness, lack of damage, sweetness of taste and freedom from blemishes indicated that consumers attached great importance to these attributes when buying mangoes. A number of studies have indicated the predominant importance that consumers place on these attributes in their fruit purchases (Racskó et al 2009;Ali et al 2010;Gunden & Thomas 2012;Jiménez-Guerrero et al 2012). It can be seen that mean scores given for food safety and marketing related attributes were not as high as those for the search and experience attributes.…”
Section: Mango Quality Attribute Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate of the results confirms that girls dislike the sour-astringent fruit, while boys do like acidulated fruit. Even more, Racskó et al (2009) stated that females gave higher importance ratings for most attributes than males.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, on the Romanian markets are prevailing fruits belonging to well-known apple cultivars, but obtained by farmers in different countries. Nowadays, if the origin of fruit and the cultivars do not influence consumer's choice (Denver, 2014;Racskó et al, 2009), consumers are increasingly interested in fruit qualities in connexion with the price and their socio-economic situation, therefore consumers' acceptance involves both the intrinsic and extrinsic product factors as well as cognitive, demographic, social and attitude factors (Bignami, 2003;Seppä, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%