2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02165.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Constitutional Symmetry Enough? Social Models and Market Integration in the US and Europe

Abstract: By comparing US and European efforts at market integration, this article questions the commonly held notion that Europe's market integration can continue without undermining its nation-based models of social protection. Three recent ECJ decisions (Viking, Laval and Rüffert) seem to confirm Scharpf's (2002) assertion that the EU suffers from constitutional asymmetry. By contrasting these developments with the earlier integration of US markets -where a rough constitutional symmetry can be said to exist -the arti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent FRA report recognized this disconnect, reporting on an NGO's complaint that the EU dispenses good recommendations on rights promotion, but these are often overridden by ‘more powerful recommendations based only on short‐term financial considerations’ (FRA, 2015, p. 131). Scholarship on the European social model highlights the persistent asymmetry (Moses, ; Scharpf, ) or ambivalence (Daly, ) between the EU's focus on market‐oriented policies and the growing body of policies to promote equality. This same ambivalence underpins EU efforts for minority social inclusion.…”
Section: Trickle‐down Minority Social Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent FRA report recognized this disconnect, reporting on an NGO's complaint that the EU dispenses good recommendations on rights promotion, but these are often overridden by ‘more powerful recommendations based only on short‐term financial considerations’ (FRA, 2015, p. 131). Scholarship on the European social model highlights the persistent asymmetry (Moses, ; Scharpf, ) or ambivalence (Daly, ) between the EU's focus on market‐oriented policies and the growing body of policies to promote equality. This same ambivalence underpins EU efforts for minority social inclusion.…”
Section: Trickle‐down Minority Social Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PWD enumerates in Article 3 a number of areas in which the minimum standards of either the host country or sending country, whichever is better from the perspective of the worker, must apply. While this seems favourable for posted workers, it has since been reinterpreted in the light of the EU's ‘Four Freedoms’ of movement, in a series of European Court of Justice (ECJ) decisions in precisely the opposite direction to that originally intended by its proponents (Moses, ). For the purpose of this study, it is decisive that the Court supported, in these four cases, the practical implementation of a ‘country of origin’ principle, asserting that union or government regulation of labour conditions at foreign service providers constitutes a violation of the free movement rights as set out in the 1957 Treaty of Rome (Hyde and Ressaissi, ).…”
Section: Mechanisms For Opening the European Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically this article deals with the so-called constitutional asymmetry in EU that have been observed in areas such as social and health policy (Clemens et al, 2014;Greer, 2011;Moses, 2011;Permanand and Mossialos, 2005;Scharpf, 2002Scharpf, , 2010. Constitutional asymmetry refers to situations where specific policy areas in EU are dominated by policies promoting market efficiency on behalf of policies promoting general (positive) political integration of the policy area (Scharpf, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%