2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
231
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
21
231
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were no signiicant diferences in median survival and the 3-year overall survival between the two treatment arms. Burmeister et al [24] received similar results when they evaluated 75 patients with adenocarcinoma. Regarding pCR and R1 resection, chemoradiotherapy was signiicantly more beneicial, but there were no signiicant diferences in median survival.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, there were no signiicant diferences in median survival and the 3-year overall survival between the two treatment arms. Burmeister et al [24] received similar results when they evaluated 75 patients with adenocarcinoma. Regarding pCR and R1 resection, chemoradiotherapy was signiicantly more beneicial, but there were no signiicant diferences in median survival.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Although the trial was stopped early due to poor accrual, there was a trend towards a higher efficacy in the threestep protocol arm than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm (3year diseasefree survival rate: 47.7% vs 27.7%; HR = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.411.07; P = 0.07) [43] . An Australian randomized phase II study reported a significant reduction of the R1 resection rate in a similar population of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (0% vs 11%, P = 0.04; pathological complete response rates of 31% vs 8%, respectively, P = 0.01) [44] .…”
Section: Combination Of Neoadjuvant Induction Chemotherapy and Chemormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of benefit was stronger for RT-CT (8.7%) than for CT alone (5.1%). The authors also directly compared RT-CT to CT alone: results were not significantly in favor of RT-CT even if this subgroup analysis was only based on 2 trials (78,79). Further studies will more clearly state if the interesting results of trimodal approach are or are not superior compared to surgery alone and also to preoperative CT alone followed by surgery.…”
Section: Trimodal Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%