1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.2265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Compressibility Important in the Thermodynamics of Polymer Mixtures?

Abstract: The effect of compressibility on the static scattering from polymer mixtures is critically evaluated through a general thermodynamic analysis. We find that compressibility plays an important role for blends comprised of chains with disparate chemical structures, and that it is effectively irrelevant for blends with similar chemical structures. [S0031-9007(97)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work we showed that a SANS measurement, when properly corrected for density fluctuations and for the dissimilar volumes of the two components, yields estimates of the osmotic susceptibility [∂ 2 ∆g/∂φ 2 ] T,P -1 . 16,17 Here we briefly discuss these previous findings, and also connect them to the standard random phase approximation (RPA) expression, which is traditionally used to analyze SANS data from polymer blends. Note that we consider experimentally relevant isothermal-isobaric conditions, and hence x, the mole fraction of monomers of species 1, and ∆g, the Gibbs free energy of mixing per mole of monomers, are the natural variables.…”
Section: Pressure Dependence Of Scattering Intensitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In previous work we showed that a SANS measurement, when properly corrected for density fluctuations and for the dissimilar volumes of the two components, yields estimates of the osmotic susceptibility [∂ 2 ∆g/∂φ 2 ] T,P -1 . 16,17 Here we briefly discuss these previous findings, and also connect them to the standard random phase approximation (RPA) expression, which is traditionally used to analyze SANS data from polymer blends. Note that we consider experimentally relevant isothermal-isobaric conditions, and hence x, the mole fraction of monomers of species 1, and ∆g, the Gibbs free energy of mixing per mole of monomers, are the natural variables.…”
Section: Pressure Dependence Of Scattering Intensitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the magnitude of experimentally observed parabolic contributions cannot be explained by Eqn. (4) alone [43].…”
Section: Polymer Incompatibility and Flory Huggins Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2),inter ij (r)/̺ i is independent of i, one still expects local composition fluctuations. Such "nonrandom-mixing" also affects the demixing behaviour [43], especially very close to the critical point [48]. According to the Ginzburg criterion [18], however, the random-mixing approximation becomes better upon increasing the chain length [49].…”
Section: Polymer Incompatibility and Flory Huggins Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase behavior of multi‐component polymeric materials has been of great interest and has been studied both experimentally and theoretically, since phase behavior is key to the compatibility in most applications involving polymer blends and block copolymers 1–23. Two characteristic features of phase transitions can be described by the temperature dependence of the Flory interaction parameter ( χ ) such as the upper critical solution transition (UCST) and the lower critical solution transition (LCST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two characteristic features of phase transitions can be described by the temperature dependence of the Flory interaction parameter ( χ ) such as the upper critical solution transition (UCST) and the lower critical solution transition (LCST). Upon cooling in the weakly interacting binary blends, UCST‐type polymer blends generally undergo a transition from the homogeneous to phase‐separated state by non‐favorable segmental interactions, while LCST‐type blends show an opposite tendency as a consequence of the thermal compressibility (or thermal expansion) difference between two components 8–19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%