2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-013-9518-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is CO2 flux from oil palm plantations on peatland controlled by soil moisture and/or soil and air temperatures?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moisture was a stronger driver of heterotrophic CO 2 losses than temperature during the measurement period, however, only at the 2006 plantation. This is in line with findings from drained oil palm plantations in Indonesia (Jauhiainen et al 2005;Marwanto and Agus 2014). Within the range of moisture contents found at the 2006 sites (around 20% volumetric moisture content), greater soil water content increased CO 2 emissions suggesting moisture limitation of decomposition.…”
Section: Environmental Controls Of Co 2 Emissionssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moisture was a stronger driver of heterotrophic CO 2 losses than temperature during the measurement period, however, only at the 2006 plantation. This is in line with findings from drained oil palm plantations in Indonesia (Jauhiainen et al 2005;Marwanto and Agus 2014). Within the range of moisture contents found at the 2006 sites (around 20% volumetric moisture content), greater soil water content increased CO 2 emissions suggesting moisture limitation of decomposition.…”
Section: Environmental Controls Of Co 2 Emissionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The association between peat temperature and heterotrophic respiration is driven by an exponential increase in enzymatic activity in response to higher temperatures up to c. 45°C (Luo and Zhou 2006). Waterlogged conditions of peatlands may limit CO 2 emissions by generating anaerobiosis which reduces peat oxygenation, while very dry conditions and water deficit may also restrain microbial respiration (Jauhianien et al 2005;Marwanto and Agus 2014). However, to date neither peat temperature nor moisture controls of CO 2 emissions from oil palm plantations are well understood, particularly in the context of in situ fluxes separated into autotropic and heterotrophic components of emissions (Couwenberg et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies measured WT depth as the distance between soil surface and groundwater level (see database 2 for measurement methods). Since groundwater depths are less than WT depths at field collection drains [44,56,57], practitioners should apply our models only to groundwater measurements.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies measured soil CO 2 flux during daytime hours, when soil temperature tends to be higher than at night, leading to inflated emission estimates [23,24,63]. An exception, Marwanto and Agus [64] assessed emissions throughout the day and night. To correct for elevated daytime soil respiration rates, we applied the 14.5% reduction suggested by Jauhiainen et al [24] to all sites except Marwanto and Agus [64].…”
Section: Soil Respiration From Closed Chamber Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faktor-faktor lingkungan yang sangat berpengaruh terhadap besarnya emisi karbon dari lahan gambut adalah suhu dan kelembapan tanah, serta electrical conductivity (EC), atau daya hantar listrik (Saiz et al 2007;Setia et al 2011). Ketiga faktor ini sangat berfluktuasi dari hari ke hari tergantung dari faktor iklim dan hidrologis sehingga berdampak pada tingginya fluktuasi emisi karbon (Hirano et al 2014;Jauhiainen et al 2014;Marwanto & Agus 2014). Untuk itu diperlukan usahausaha untuk melakukan pengukuran dan monitoring emisi CO 2 dari lahan gambut dan parameter lingkungan biofisik yang memengaruhinya.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified