2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is caring about the environment enough for sustainable mobility? An exploratory case study from South Tyrol (Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the main reasons that impact on the implementation of sustainable mobility behaviors are weakly linked to environmental concern, rather they appear to be better explained by affordability and comfort 21 . Accordingly, a previous study carried out in Italy has highlighted no significant associations between green self-identity and sustainable mobility behaviors 22 and a further study, carried out on 28 European countries, has shown that 60% of people living in Italy choose the means of transport considering its comfort and not the environmental issue 23 . In addition, the low diffusion of sharing services in Italy 24 and the presence of few stations where one can pick up and drop off the shared vehicle, lead the citizen to increase efforts for the realization of that behavior that negatively impact the repetition of it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, the main reasons that impact on the implementation of sustainable mobility behaviors are weakly linked to environmental concern, rather they appear to be better explained by affordability and comfort 21 . Accordingly, a previous study carried out in Italy has highlighted no significant associations between green self-identity and sustainable mobility behaviors 22 and a further study, carried out on 28 European countries, has shown that 60% of people living in Italy choose the means of transport considering its comfort and not the environmental issue 23 . In addition, the low diffusion of sharing services in Italy 24 and the presence of few stations where one can pick up and drop off the shared vehicle, lead the citizen to increase efforts for the realization of that behavior that negatively impact the repetition of it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, the two age groups have different social dynamics within the family and different daily practices linked to family, work, and free time [10]. The greater propensity of young people to purchase an EV may also be due to their greater sensitivity to environmental sustainability compared to the elderly [56,57]. This greater attention to the environment is also evident from the use of conventional bikes as a mean of transport: daily bike use entails a greater propensity to purchase EVs, confirming that pro-environmental choices can lead to other environmentally friendly behavior [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater propensity of young people to purchase an EV may also be due to their greater sensitivity to environmental sustainability compared to the elderly [56,57]. This greater attention to the environment is also evident from the use of conventional bikes as a mean of transport: daily bike use entails a greater propensity to purchase EVs, confirming that pro-environmental choices can lead to other environmentally friendly behavior [56]. While practices concerning free time and holidays seem to support the propensity to buy an EV in the study areas, new means of transportation do not seem to be able to answer daily mobility needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, private transport has been the dominant mobility solution in areas with low population density [ 12 , 32 ]. Specifically, older people [ 33 ] and households with children [ 34 , 35 ] have been demonstrated to be reliant on private cars. Similarly, temporary rural residents tend to use private transport to travel to their destination and within the local region while being on holiday [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: The Challenges Of Sustainable Rural Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%