1990
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90359-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is "Campylobacter upsaliensis" an unrecognised cause of human diarrhoea?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
44
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have found that a filtration technique was important for sufficient isolation of C. upsaliensis (15,23). Goossens (13) found a pronounced difference between selective media and the filtration technique in favor of the filtration, but the two selective media that were used contained 30 and 32 mg of cefoperazone/liter, which probably could have been inhibitory to the growth of C. upsaliensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Others have found that a filtration technique was important for sufficient isolation of C. upsaliensis (15,23). Goossens (13) found a pronounced difference between selective media and the filtration technique in favor of the filtration, but the two selective media that were used contained 30 and 32 mg of cefoperazone/liter, which probably could have been inhibitory to the growth of C. upsaliensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early studies, only C. jejuni and C. coli were reported. However, in 1983, a new species named C. upsaliensis was isolated for the first time from canine feces (37) and further characterized and described in both human feces in 1990 (15) and dog feces in 1991 (36). Since then, C. upsaliensis has been increasingly prevalent in dogs, according to published reports, and even more prevalent than C. jejuni, comprising 64 to 82% (4,27,35,37) of the strains isolated from dogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these involve the direct microscopic detection of the microorganism in stool, the recovery of the organism from culture following the use of a filtration method, or the use of a specialized selective medium for the enhanced recovery of Campylobacter from stool (9). Most clinical laboratories do not use the direct microscopic or filtration method, because microscopy is insensitive (22,25,33), and filtration is cumbersome and may lack sensitivity (11). The use of a selective medium is recommended for the optimal recovery of Campylobacter from stool samples (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. laridis is a recognized bird-associated species [8] and has previously been isolated from a resident with enteritis in the affected area (S. J. Hudson, personal communication). It is common practice in routine diagnostic laboratories to use only one selective media which may be inadequate to isolate some Camrpylobacter species [9]. Further the identification of campylobacters is often rudimentary and the hippurate test may give doubtful results [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%