Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1315803.1315825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Bloom's taxonomy appropriate for computer science?

Abstract: Bloom's taxonomy attempts to provide a set of levels of cognitive engagement with material being learned. It is usually presented as a generic framework. In this paper we outline some studies which examine whether the taxonomy is appropriate for computing, and how its application in computing might differ from its application elsewhere. We place this in the context of ongoing debates concerning graduateness and attempts to 'benchmark' the content of a computing degree.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest is Johnson and Fuller's experiment showing a disconnect between the classification of freshman computer science test questions among educators and test writers [22]. The computer science educators did not classify many, if any, freshman test questions as meeting the higher-level educational objectives of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis stated in Bloom's taxonomy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is Johnson and Fuller's experiment showing a disconnect between the classification of freshman computer science test questions among educators and test writers [22]. The computer science educators did not classify many, if any, freshman test questions as meeting the higher-level educational objectives of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis stated in Bloom's taxonomy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given its popularity through the years, the taxonomy has been condensed, expanded and reinterpreted in a variety of ways (Forehand, 2012;Johnson and Fuller, 2006). The model was revised by Anderson et al (2001) with a number of significant changes to the terminology, structure and emphasis.…”
Section: The Bloom Taxonomy and Meaningful Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning taxonomies are important for computing education because it gives the community a vocabulary to use when discussing student understanding and learning -and curriculum to support that. Taxonomies The Revised Bloom's Taxonomy's value has been called into question in computer science [8] and has been modified to include "higher application" in order to make it relevant to the field [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%