Is Being a Jerk Necessary for Originality? Examining the Role of Disagreeableness in the Sharing and Utilization of Original Ideas

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to investigate the relationship between lower levels of agreeableness (i.e., disagreeableness) and innovation process such as idea generation, promotion, and group utilization, as well as potential contextual moderators of these relationships. Design/Methodology/Approach In the first laboratory study (n = 201), we examined links among individual and group measures of agreeableness, originality of ideas generated, and group utilization of ideas. In a second laboratory study (n = 291), we utilized confederates in an online environment to investigate the originality of ideas shared with group members after manipulating both feedback and originality of ideas generated by others. Findings In study 1, disagreeableness was generally unrelated to the originality of ideas generated, but positively related to group utilization of ideas. Similar trends were observed in study 2 with the caveat that disagreeableness was positively linked to originality of ideas shared only when the social context was unsupportive of novel ideas and confederate group members shared original ideas. Implications Disagreeable personalities may be helpful in combating the challenges faced in the innovation process, but social context is also critical. In particular, an environment supportive of original thinking may negate the utility of disagreeableness and, in fact, disagreeableness may hamper the originality of ideas shared.Originality/Value Few studies have investigated the relationship between disagreeableness and originality and even fewer have examined both the social context and stage of innovation in which these relationships may occur. Results suggest there is value in considering each in future investigations.

A Meta‐Analysis of the Relationship between Mathematics Achievement and Creativity

“…For example, the study conducted by Unal and Demir (2009) was eliminated because in it, they investigated the relationship between students' mathematics achievement and divergent thinking in terms of students' self-beliefs about their creative abilities rather than measuring their cognitive outcomes related to mathematical achievement or creativity. A study conducted by Hunter and Cushenbery (2015) was also excluded because it reported students' mathematics achievement through self-report. Because the focus of the present meta-analytic study was to understand the strength of the relationship between mathematics achievement and creative ability in terms of cognitive outcomes, the studies were excluded if the outcomes (creativity or mathematics achievement) were measured through affective factors.…”

Validity and Utility of the Test of Creative Thinking Drawing Production for Dutch Adolescents

“…When standardized achievement tests are used instead of GPA, or verbal creativity tests instead of self-report scales, correlations are stronger (Gajda et al, 2017b). Moreover, in recent studies conducted in the United States, the correlation between creativity and academic achievement is stronger in elementary ( r = .54; Wallace & Russ, 2015) and middle school students ( r = .35; Dai et al, 2012), than in college students ( r = .06; Hunter & Cushenbery, 2015). Furthermore, according to Karwowski et al (2020), this correlation varies by subject.…”

Linking Personality Trait Variance in Self-Managed Teams to Team Innovation

“…Agreeableness is a personality trait that captures the degree to which individuals are perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm, and considerate. People low in agreeableness are typically described not only as hard, unforgiving, and headstrong but also as more successful in advancing their ideas and opinions in organizations (Hunter & Cushenbery, 2015). Team members who are low in agreeableness may be more willing to choose ideas that do not go along with usual social norms and will likely have the courage to enforce these new ideas in the group.…”

“…This idea is also supported by a meta-analysis (Feist, 1998) showing that characteristics such as hostility and arrogance are associated with more individual innovative achievement. Group members with low agreeableness are thus likely to be more successful in getting their ideas heard and making sure that their ideas are utilized by their group (Hunter & Cushenbery, 2015).…”