Is Barthel Index Suitable for Assessing Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Dementia?

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate application of the Barthel Index (BI) in assessing basic activities of daily living (ADL) of patients with dementia using Rasch analysis. Design: A multi-country cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants: Nineteen long-term care facilities located in China, Japan, South Korea, and Thailand. A total of 644 patients with dementia were included. Methods: Unidimensionality, global and item fit, local dependence, person-item targeting, threshold disordering, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined. Negative correlations between scores for DIF items and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) were evaluated. Results: Item reliability (1.0) and person reliability (.88) were acceptable. The Rasch dimension explained 72.9% of the variance (Eigenvalue = 27), while the first contrast explained 6.6% (Eigenvalue = 2.4). The "mobility" was misfitting to the Rasch model (infit mean square = 1.86). The overall difficulty of the BI exceeded patients' ability (person location = −2.27 logits). The "stairs climbing" and "mobility" showed narrow category thresholds (< 1.4 logits). The location of "controlling bladder" and "toilet use" overlapped. Removing "stairs climbing", collapsing categories with narrow threshold widths in "mobility", and combining "controlling bowel" and "controlling bladder" into one item, improved unidimensionality, and item fit of the scale. Only three items ("grooming", "dressing", and "toilet use") were free from DIF across countries. The scores for "feeding" were negatively related to scores for "disinhibition" (r = −0.46, P < 0.01), and scores for "controlling bowel" were negatively related to scores for "disinhibition" (r = −0.44, P < 0.01), "agitation" (r = −0.32, P < 0.05), and "aggression" (r = −0.27, P < 0.01) in Japanese samples. Conclusions and Implications: The performance of the BI for assessing patients with dementia might be compromised by misfit items, person-item mistargeting, measurement gaps, redundant items, narrow threshold width, and item bias. Mobility ability might not be helpful for determining capability of basic ADL in the patients. Comparisons of BI scores between countries should be undertaken with caution due to

Conversion between Mini‐Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores in older adults undergoing selective surgery using Rasch analysis

“…Because the MMSE and MoCA were scored polytomously, the partial credit model was selected for Rasch analysis (Linacre, 2012). A value of zero was allocated to the mean of item difficulty and the mean person location should approximate zero for a well‐targeted tool (Yi et al., 2020). ICC and diagnostic function were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).…”

Contribution of a Multicomponent Intervention on Functional Capacity and Independence on Activities of Daily Living in Individuals With Neurocognitive Disorder

“…Despite the increasing evidence acknowledging the bene cial effect of exercise on ADL performance, results are still broadly heterogeneous and of low quality (14,44,57). The dose-dependent relationship remains unclear and, although the BI has been used globally (58), empirical evidence regarding its validity for assessing individuals with major NCD is still scarce (59). Even though our previous research demonstrated the bene cial effect of MT intervention in ADL functionality in older adults with major NCD…”

Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice

“…While Yi et al recommend assessments using the Barthel Test, they also recommended that the assessment tool be tested using the intended target group prior to introducing it into practice. Their study shows the Barthel Test to be unsuitable for use in patients with dementia, in whom the results of independence tests are almost always unreliable and do not correspond with reality [ 33 ].…”