Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles?

Bailey, Joseph P.; Miele, Amy; Axsen, Jonn

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.001

Cited by 104 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One limitation of EVSE-based data is that it often does not include vehicle-specific data, which complicates analysis of vehicle usage patterns. Bailey and Axsen (2015) 2015…”

Section: Introduction To Literature Topics and Methods Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some respondents expressed concern about loss of control of charging, though on average acceptance rates are high. Bailey et al Bailey et al (2015) Uncontrolled charging will put strain on the grid due to charging occurring at existing peaks. Off peak or time of use charging is preferential but could create a peak at the beginning of the off-peak time.…”

Section: Pevsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A o di g to uestio ai e su e s a d i te ie s ai st ea a u e s k o ledge a d awareness of PEV recharging infrastructures is currently low Bailey et al, 2015;Kurani et al, 2016). The only consumers who have a high awareness of charging infrastructure are consumers who have purchased a PEV or ones interested in purchasing one.…”

Section: Information Education and Outreachmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure

Hardman

Jenn

Tal

et al. 2018

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Self Cite

495

211

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the autho s e sio of a o k that was published in the following source: Hardman, S.; Jenn, A.; Beard, G.; Daina, N.;Figenbaum, E.; Jochem, P. E. P.; Kinnear, N. A. D.; Pontes, J. P.;Refa, N.;Turrentine, T. S.; Witkamp, B. (2018). AbstractThis paper presents a literature review of studies that investigate infrastructure needs to support the market introduction of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). It focuses on literature relating to consumer preferences for charging infrastructure, and how consumers interact with and use this infrastructure. This includes studies that use questionnaire surveys, interviews, modelling, GPS data from vehicles, and data from electric vehicle charging equipment. These studies indicate that the most important location for PEV charging is at home, followed by work, and then public locations. Studies have found that more effort is needed to ensure consumers have easy access to PEV charging and that charging at home, work, or public locations should not be free of cost. Research indicates that PEV charging will not impact electricity grids on the short term, however charging may need to be managed when the vehicles are deployed in greater numbers. In some areas of study the literature is not sufficiently mature to draw any conclusions from. More research is especially needed to determine how much infrastructure is needed to support the roll out of PEVs. This paper ends with policy implications and suggests avenues of future research.Next, we provide background information on charging modes and levels and then introduce the approach to the literature review. Section 2 then summarises the literature, whilst Section 3 concludes with insights for policymakers and literature gaps.

show abstract

“…One limitation of EVSE-based data is that it often does not include vehicle-specific data, which complicates analysis of vehicle usage patterns. Bailey and Axsen (2015) 2015…”

Section: Introduction To Literature Topics and Methods Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Pevsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Information Education and Outreachmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure

Hardman

Jenn

Tal

et al. 2018

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Self Cite

495

211

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The four attributes (purchase price, weekly fuel cost, vehicle electric range and charge speed) were sufficient to address our heterogeneity-based research questions, and appear consistently in previous research-see Hidrue et al (2011) and Tanaka et al (2014) for recent reviews. We did not include representation of public charging infrastructure; empirical research suggests that home charging infrastructure is more likely to be important among potential early mainstream buyers (Bailey et al, 2015). Aside from the drivetrain and the attributes depicted in Table 2, respondents were informed that all vehicles were identical, e.g.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers

2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although PEV range is typically adequate for completing most daily home-based tours without intermediate charging [7], continued PEV adoption, as technological forecasts indicate, can benefit from continued installation and planning of out-of-home charging [8], in addition to further considering PEV driver's perceptions and experiences at stations. Although consumer interviews and analogous insights from the literature are helpful for describing charging behaviors, a study defining user groups or "market segments" based on a pattern analysis of empirical time-dependent charging data from out-of-home charging stations is absent in the literature.…”

Section: Journal Of Advanced Transportationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Pattern Analysis of Daily Electric Vehicle Charging Profiles: Operational Efficiency and Environmental Impacts

Desai

Chen

Armington

2018

Journal of Advanced Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) are considered one solution to reducing GHG emissions from private transport. Additionally, PEV adopters often have free access to public charging facilities. Through a pattern analysis, this study identifies five distinct clusters of daily PEV charging profiles observed at the public charging stations. Empirically observed patterns indicate a significant amount of operational inefficiency, where 54% of the total parking duration PEVs do not consume electricity, preventing other users from charging. This study identifies the opportunity cost in terms of GHG emissions savings if gasoline vehicles are replaced with potential PEV adopters. The time spent in parking without charging by current PEV users can be used by these potential PEV users to charge their PEVs and replace the use of gasoline. The results suggest that reducing inefficient station use leads to significant reductions in emissions. Overall, there is significant variability in outcomes depending on the specific cluster membership.

show abstract

Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles?

Cited by 104 publications

References 16 publications

A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure

A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure

Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers

A Pattern Analysis of Daily Electric Vehicle Charging Profiles: Operational Efficiency and Environmental Impacts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About