“…Twenty-four papers were deemed to potentially meet the review inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 papers were excluded, either as these constituted reviews (Carpenter, 2007;Schneier, Blanco, Antia & Liebowitz, 2002), or as there were no paranoia data about individuals with ASD (Skokauskas & Gallagher, 2012), or because the studies did not report outcome measures pertaining to paranoia in individuals with ASD (Bara, Ciaramidaro, Walter & Adenzato, 2011;Collacott, Cooper & McGrother, 1992;Couture, Penn, Losh, Adolphs, Hurley & Piven, 2009;Gutkovich, Carlson & Carlson, 2007;Hallerbäck, Lugnegård & Gillberg, 2012;Konstantareas & Hewitt, 2001;Murphy, 2006;Pary, 1993;Pilowsky, Yirmiya, Arbelle & Mozes, 2000;Prado de Oliveira, 1999;Shastri, Alla & Sabaratnam, 2006;Siegel et al, 2014;Travé Rodriguez, Barreiro Marin, Galvez Borrero, del Olmo Romero-Nieva & Diaz Alvarez, 1994;Yan et al, 2000), or as paranoia outcome data about individuals with ASD were subsumed and subsequently analysed in a more recent paper (Pinkham, Hopfinger, Pelphrey, Piven & Penn, 2008). One further study was identified which was published during manuscript preparation, and sub-group data were obtained MT personal communication, July 2015).…”