2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000261882.47616.7d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is all ventricular fibrillation the same? A comparison of ischemically induced with electrically induced ventricular fibrillation in a porcine cardiac arrest and resuscitation model*

Abstract: Resuscitation from ischemic ventricular fibrillation is more difficult than electrical ventricular fibrillation and is characterized by greater time to restoration of spontaneous circulation, frequent refibrillation, greater number of countershocks, higher epinephrine dose during resuscitation efforts, profound cardiac dysfunction, and a short-term survival rate approaching clinical experience. Ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation is a more clinically relevant model for the evaluation of resuscitation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poor resuscitation rates observed in this experiment with shorter untreated ventricular fibrillation and CPR times than our previous work 23,35,36 can be explained by the severity of the model and the significant postresuscitation instability derived from the ischemic and very arrhythmogenic substrate in this animal model. 37,38 Our study has several limitations. It is not possible to say whether the effect of hypothermia on myocardial ischemic injury was due to the timing of or to differences in myocardial temperatures achieved during the experiments with different methods of hypothermia induction.…”
Section: Yannopoulos Et Al Intra-cpr Hypothermia and Myocardial Infarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor resuscitation rates observed in this experiment with shorter untreated ventricular fibrillation and CPR times than our previous work 23,35,36 can be explained by the severity of the model and the significant postresuscitation instability derived from the ischemic and very arrhythmogenic substrate in this animal model. 37,38 Our study has several limitations. It is not possible to say whether the effect of hypothermia on myocardial ischemic injury was due to the timing of or to differences in myocardial temperatures achieved during the experiments with different methods of hypothermia induction.…”
Section: Yannopoulos Et Al Intra-cpr Hypothermia and Myocardial Infarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 There was typically no mention (9 cases) of the failure of prompt defibrillation as indicating a nonelectric source for the cardiac arrest. 16,17 Almost all cases (11 of 12) ignored the critical dart-to-heart distance, which is well established in the literature for the induction of VF. 27 The unsupported implied inclusion criterion of any chest ECD exposure (regardless of the dart-to-heart distance) was surprising in view of the negative epidemiological association found between ECD chest exposures and mortality.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…16 With any chest compressions, defibrillation has a 90% success rate after 10 minutes of electrically induced VF with ≤3 shocks. 17 Hence, the failure of prompt defibrillation tends to exculpate an electric cause for VF.…”
Section: Confusing Electrically Induced Vf With Ischemically Induced Vfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor collateralization influenced the CPR-generated regional myocardial blood flow, and possibly the resuscitation rate and degree of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction [173,174]. A model of ischemically induced VF followed by standard resuscitative interventions would have replicated more closely the conditions of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation [174] than the method of electrically induced VF. The hemodynamic response to exogenously administered arginine vasopressin may be different in humans because the vasopressin receptors in pigs (lysine vasopressin) and humans (arginine vasopressin) are different [175].…”
Section: The Experimental Model Of Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the swine myocardium is poorly collateralized compared to the myocardium of patients with chronic obstructive coronary artery disease, who are likely to demonstrate collateralization [172,173]. Poor collateralization influenced the CPR-generated regional myocardial blood flow, and possibly the resuscitation rate and degree of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction [173,174]. A model of ischemically induced VF followed by standard resuscitative interventions would have replicated more closely the conditions of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation [174] than the method of electrically induced VF.…”
Section: The Experimental Model Of Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%