Is Alcoholics Anonymous religious, spiritual, neither? Findings from 25 years of mechanisms of behavior change research

Abstract

Background Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is a worldwide recovery mutual-help organization that continues to arouse controversy. In large part, concerns persist because of AA’s ostensibly quasi-religious/spiritual orientation and emphasis. In 1990 the United States’ Institute of Medicine called for more studies on AA’s effectiveness and its mechanisms of behavior change (MOBC) stimulating a flurry of federally funded research. This article reviews the religious/spiritual origins of AA and its program and contrasts its theory with findings from this latest research. Method Literature review, summary, and synthesis of studies examining AA’s MOBC. Results While AA’s original main text (Alcoholics Anonymous, 1939; 2001; “the Big Book”) purports recovery is achieved through quasi-religious/spiritual means (“spiritual awakening”), findings from studies on MOBC suggest this may be true only for a minority of participants with high addiction severity. AA’s beneficial effects seem to be carried predominantly by social, cognitive, and affective mechanisms. These mechanisms are more aligned with the experiences reported by AA’s own larger and more diverse membership as detailed in its later social, cognitive, and behaviorally-oriented publications (e.g., Living Sober, 1975) written when AA membership numbered more than a million men and women. Conclusions Alcoholics Anonymous appears to be an effective clinical and public health ally that aids addiction recovery through its ability to mobilize therapeutic mechanisms similar to those mobilized in formal treatment, but is able to do this for free over the long-term in the communities in which people live.

Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy

“…These are free and ubiquitous resources and appear to play an important public health role in ameliorating the AOD problem burden (Kelly, 2017a; Kelly, 2017b). The second most commonly sought source of help was formal treatment (28%).…”

A daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of our spiritual condition

“…In setting the 'spiritual programme' of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) alongside the evidence for AA's mechanisms of behaviour change (MOBCs), Kelly [2], illuminates the problematic interface between secular professional treatment and 12-Step mutual aid. Research undertaken in the United Kingdom by Day et al [3,4] demonstrates that its apparently 'religious' nature is a significant factor in skepticism about 12-Step mutual aid among professionals and their clients.…”

“…Best [2] emphasizes the potential significance of the findings of this body of research on AA. He asserts its additive and potentially synergistic value to our professional efforts in addressing addiction at a time of global financial…”

Sober social networks: The role of online support groups in recovery from alcohol addiction

“…In comparison to the research on traditional, face‐to‐face mutual help organisations like AA, there is less empirical evidence of the potential of online support networks to shape identity formation and transformation, counter the negative impact of self‐stigma, and affect positive health outcomes (Kelly, ). Results from a study conducted by Chou et al () do suggest that online networks confer health benefits in a similar way to face‐to‐face mutual help organisations, findings consistent with an emerging body of research showing that positive online interactions between members of recovery communities contribute to individuals achieving long‐term identity change, which supports and sustains their recovery efforts in recovery from addiction (Best, Bliuc, Iqbal, Upton, & Hodgkins, ; Bliuc, Best, Beckwith & Iqbal, ; Bliuc, Bliuc, Best, Iqbal, & Upton, ) and other disorders (including disordered eating; Hastings, McNamara, Allan, & Marriott, ).…”