2020
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1818201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is afamin a potential early biomarker for subsequent development of preeclampsia? A nested case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate regression analysis was performed in 4 PE-related studies [Köningeret al., ( 18 ); Tramontana et al., ( 15 ); Tramontana et al., ( 16 ); Çalışkan et al., ( 19 )]. The meta-regression analysis showed that there was a significant difference in serum afamin levels between pregnant women with PE and healthy pregnant women ( p = 0.015, ES = 3.089, 95% CI: 1.244-7.666) The heterogeneity of the 4 studies was significant ( I 2 = 90.6%), and there was no significant publication bias (t = 3.80, p = 0.063).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multivariate regression analysis was performed in 4 PE-related studies [Köningeret al., ( 18 ); Tramontana et al., ( 15 ); Tramontana et al., ( 16 ); Çalışkan et al., ( 19 )]. The meta-regression analysis showed that there was a significant difference in serum afamin levels between pregnant women with PE and healthy pregnant women ( p = 0.015, ES = 3.089, 95% CI: 1.244-7.666) The heterogeneity of the 4 studies was significant ( I 2 = 90.6%), and there was no significant publication bias (t = 3.80, p = 0.063).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgroup analysis based on the time of blood collection found that the plasma afamin levels of pregnant women with PE in the first trimester were significantly higher than those in healthy pregnant women (SMD = 0.808, 95% CI: 0.558-1.059); the plasma afamin levels in pregnant women with PE in the second and third trimesters were significantly higher than those in healthy pregnant women (SMD = 0.904, 95% CI: 0.570-1.239) (Figure 7). (19)]. The meta-regression analysis showed that there was a significant difference in serum afamin levels between pregnant women with PE and healthy pregnant women (p = 0.015, ES = 3.089, 95% CI: 1.244-7.666) The heterogeneity of the 4 studies was significant (I 2 = 90.6%), and there was no significant publication bias (t = 3.80, p = 0.063).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tramontana et al, involving 30 PE patients and Köninger et al, involving 39 PE patients in their studies found that the first-trimester afamin levels were lower in patients in control compared to the PE group 11,12 . Caliskan et al, in a study of 39 PE patients found that PE developed in those who had high second-trimester afamin levels 3 . Our study differs from other studies in that it detects and reveals high levels of afamin in both first and third trimesters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Vitamin E is an important protective lipophilic antioxidant that protects against oxidative stress during pregnancy and postpartum 4 . Serum afamin concentrations have previously been reported to increase in response to high oxidative stress 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation