2012
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is admission blood glucose concentration a more powerful predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction than diabetes diagnosis? A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the relative association of admission blood glucose levels and antecedent diabetes on early and long-term survival in a contemporary UK population of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI).DesignRetrospective cohort study based on the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project dataset.SettingTertiary care centre.Participants4111 (20.3% known diabetes) consecutive patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (58.3% STEMI) between October 2002 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Rydén et al 2013). In patients with ACS, the recommended appropriate screening method is an OGTT, performed at least 4 to 5 days after the initial coronary event to minimize the risk of false positive results (Rydén et al 2013).Admission blood glucose was found to be strongly associated with mortality in patients with myocardial infarction (Gholap et al 2012) and current evidence on prognostic role of hyperglycaemia in ACS allows us to suggest its direct involvement in short term complications (De Caterina et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Rydén et al 2013). In patients with ACS, the recommended appropriate screening method is an OGTT, performed at least 4 to 5 days after the initial coronary event to minimize the risk of false positive results (Rydén et al 2013).Admission blood glucose was found to be strongly associated with mortality in patients with myocardial infarction (Gholap et al 2012) and current evidence on prognostic role of hyperglycaemia in ACS allows us to suggest its direct involvement in short term complications (De Caterina et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing recognition of the significant relationship between diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and the contribution that each of these conditions makes to the risk of morbidity and mortality from both diseases (Rydén et Gholap et al 2012;De Caterina et al 2010). Coronary artery disease is common in patients with true dysglycaemic syndromes (DS) which includes diabetes mellitus (DM), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (Gerstein et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…170 Therefore, it was imperative to develop a culturally informed and appropriate intervention for this at-risk population, whose dietary practices and frequently reported low levels of physical activity contribute to the onset of T2DM. 144 At the time of developing the Let's Prevent programme, studies investigating the prevention of diabetes mellitus in migrant populations in the UK were lacking.…”
Section: Drafting a Curriculum For Black And Minority Ethnic Participmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Admission hyperglycaemia appears to be more strongly associated with subsequent mortality than a prior diagnosis of diabetes. 1 Furthermore, normalisation of glucose after admission has been associated with better survival in hyperglycaemic patients with ACS whether or not they are treated with insulin, 3 although a recent report raised the possibility that intravenous insulin infusions may only be of benefit for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Admission hyperglycaemia appears to be more strongly associated with subsequent mortality than a prior diagnosis of diabetes. 1 Furthermore, normalisation of glucose after admission has been associated with better survival in hyperglycaemic patients with ACS whether or not they are treated with insulin, 3 although a recent report raised the possibility that intravenous insulin infusions may only be of benefit for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. 4 While there is a powerful pathophysiological basis for the toxicity of glucose in the context of acute coronary ischaemia based on oxidative stress, 5,6 enhanced platelet activation and thrombin formation, 7 and impaired response to antiplatelet drugs, 8 the evidence base for the value of intravenous insulin given to lower glucose in ACS is weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%