2018
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is additional 5-day vasoactive drug therapy necessary for acute variceal bleeding after successful endoscopic hemostasis?

Abstract: Background:Vasoactive drugs and endoscopic therapy have been widely used in the management of acute variceal bleeding of cirrhosis patients. The current standard regimen of vasoactive drugs is in combination with endoscopic therapy and continues for up to 5 days; however, the necessity of vasoactive drugs after endoscopic hemostasis was still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and optimal duration of adjuvant vasoactive drugs after hemorrhage c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as vasoconstrictors may be associated with potentially serious adverse events, the feasibility of a shorter administration (i.e., 24-48 h vs. 3-5 days) has been considered. In a recent meta-analysis, although the risk of 42-day mortality was not significantly different between one to three and five days, risk stratification was missing [41]. It may be that Child A patients could receive a shorter duration of therapy, whereas all others would require five days, but further studies are required to answer this question.…”
Section: Intravenous Splanchnic Vasoconstrictorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as vasoconstrictors may be associated with potentially serious adverse events, the feasibility of a shorter administration (i.e., 24-48 h vs. 3-5 days) has been considered. In a recent meta-analysis, although the risk of 42-day mortality was not significantly different between one to three and five days, risk stratification was missing [41]. It may be that Child A patients could receive a shorter duration of therapy, whereas all others would require five days, but further studies are required to answer this question.…”
Section: Intravenous Splanchnic Vasoconstrictorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several systematic reviews/meta-analyses, including numerous RCTs with thousands of patients, have evaluated the efficacy and safety of vasoactive agents in acute EGVH 52 53 54 55 56 57 . In summary, vasoactive agents are superior to no vasoactive treatment in terms of rates of in-hospital mortality, overall mortality, variceal bleeding control, variceal rebleeding, and blood transfusion requirement.…”
Section: Pre-endoscopy Management Of Acute Egvhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once endoscopic haemostasis is achieved, shorter regimens of vasoactive drugs have been suggested although no clear general recommendation can be given based on the available data. [57][58][59] EBL should be the treatment of choice for oesophageal varices whereas gastric varices require glue injection. Bacterial infection and renal failure are the most feared complications of AVB and should be prophylactically treated with antibiotics and careful replacement of fluids and electrolytes.…”
Section: Patients With Avbmentioning
confidence: 99%