2008
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607082223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Actor Network Theory Critique?

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: AbstractIn this essai we debate the extent to which Actor Network Theory (ANT) provides a meaningful contribution to the body of critical theories of organization. Critical approaches are commonly associated with a denaturalizing ontology, a reflexive epistemology and an anti-performative politics. In contrast, we suggest that ANT relies on a naturalizing ontology, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
191
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
191
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Within ANT scholarship, a person, a plant, a machine, a weather system or even a germ (or an electron) are all referred to as "actors." As Whittle and Spicer (2004) note:…”
Section: Mobility Can Be Understood As a Socially-situated Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within ANT scholarship, a person, a plant, a machine, a weather system or even a germ (or an electron) are all referred to as "actors." As Whittle and Spicer (2004) note:…”
Section: Mobility Can Be Understood As a Socially-situated Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most controversial challenges between ANT researchers can be projected through ANT's commitment to 'radical symmetry', which is the result of visualizing the power of humans and non-humans as equal, ambiguous and debatable (Whittle & Spicer, 2008). An early critique of the power was debated in Amsterdamska's (1990) review of science in action called "Surely you must be joking, Mr. Latour".…”
Section: Ongoing Debate About Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Callon & Latour (1992) state, there is no agential priority between human and non-human which means a machine can presumably be thought of having the very same degree of agency as a human. Moreover, as Whittle & Spicer (2008) discuss, a symmetrical network acquires a heterogeneous engineer Law (1986) who collects and puzzles all materials and non-materials to form a stable network and has to make sure that the actors do not betray to their roles and promises. To make sure that actors do not step back from their positions and agreements, Latour (1987) proposes the "black boxing" strategy by which the actors are ensured to be enrolled in the existing network since they are enlightened that the cost of other alternatives will be high (Latour & Woolgar, 1986).…”
Section: Ongoing Debate About Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations