2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is accommodation a confounder in pupillometry research?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explanation does not make sense for the small fixational saccades and microsaccades that were analyzed in our study (see the “Saccade detection and rate estimation” section), when depth was virtually identical for different fixation locations. Furthermore, microfluctuations in accommodation during fixation do not predict fluctuations in pupil size ( 60 ), and accommodation changes during task performance are too small to explain the task-evoked pupil response ( 86 ). The function of the saccade-locked pupil response, if there is one, remains unclear ( 47 ); however, its origin is clearer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explanation does not make sense for the small fixational saccades and microsaccades that were analyzed in our study (see the “Saccade detection and rate estimation” section), when depth was virtually identical for different fixation locations. Furthermore, microfluctuations in accommodation during fixation do not predict fluctuations in pupil size ( 60 ), and accommodation changes during task performance are too small to explain the task-evoked pupil response ( 86 ). The function of the saccade-locked pupil response, if there is one, remains unclear ( 47 ); however, its origin is clearer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several procedures exist for correcting effects of gaze position on pupil size measurements (Gagl et al, 2011; Hayes & Petrov, 2016). In practice, if gaze shifts are small (less than ~10 degrees) and/or the number of trials large, effects due to parallax are minimal (Kooijman et al, 2021). In nonvisual contexts, on the other hand, large differences in gaze angle due to spontaneous scanning, or prompted by cognitive processing (e.g., raising eyes when thinking, remembering, imagining; Bakan & Shotland, 1969), may be more problematic, requiring monitoring of eye movements and possible correction for eye gaze shifts.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%