2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2234663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a Tax Amnesty a Good Fiscal Policy? A Review of State Experience in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to Arindam et al (1995); Luitel -Mahar (2013); Luitel -Sobel (2007) are in line with our above arguments. Laffer (2003) takes the United States for instance, a federal, state and local tax amnesty would add some $50 billion in the first year and $25 billion over the coming 10 years.…”
Section: Short-term Effect Of Tax Amnesty On Tax Revenuesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to Arindam et al (1995); Luitel -Mahar (2013); Luitel -Sobel (2007) are in line with our above arguments. Laffer (2003) takes the United States for instance, a federal, state and local tax amnesty would add some $50 billion in the first year and $25 billion over the coming 10 years.…”
Section: Short-term Effect Of Tax Amnesty On Tax Revenuesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, as the assessment period gradually approaches to the final day of the assessment period, the probability that tax evaders are exempted from penalties and successfully evade taxes increases. Hence, tax revenue received by the government gradually declined and ultimately converged on a fixed value (some examples are Arindam et al1995;Luitel -Mahar 2013;Luitel -Sobel 2007).…”
Section: Short-term Effect Of Tax Amnesty On Tax Revenuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang & Hseieh (2015) asserted that tax amnesties had no effect on tax revenue whether in the long or short run. Both Fischer et al, 1992;Luitel & Mahar (2013) agreed that tax amnesty could increase revenue in the short run. Although there is tax amnesty, tax evaders may still not participate (Olivella, 1996).…”
Section: Tax Amnestymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact between tax amnesties and state revenue has been empirically be examined (Alm and Beck 1990, Dubin, Graetz, and Wilde 1992, Beck 1993, Luitel andSobel 2007). On the other hand Luitel and Mahar (2013) found that the government did not earn significant revenue with the tax amnesty program [8]. A US state study covering 76 amnesties in 23 years concludes that short-term income is accrued as a result of the country's first amnesty, accompanied by long-term revenue losses [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%