2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1564-913x.2005.tb00571.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a stable workforce good for productivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While these results do not imply that success cannot be bought in football, they do support the hypothesis that player cultivation and team stability play a role in improving match winning probabilities. While there has not been any previous studies of the impact of team stability in football, the results found are in line with the broader literature on employee productivity and tenure (Auer et al, 2005). The positive effects of player tenure seem to indicate that player success in football does have an aspect that is club specific, or firm specific as it is called in the human capital literature.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…While these results do not imply that success cannot be bought in football, they do support the hypothesis that player cultivation and team stability play a role in improving match winning probabilities. While there has not been any previous studies of the impact of team stability in football, the results found are in line with the broader literature on employee productivity and tenure (Auer et al, 2005). The positive effects of player tenure seem to indicate that player success in football does have an aspect that is club specific, or firm specific as it is called in the human capital literature.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, in flexible labour markets, firms will invest less in workers' firm-specific human capital and this hurts productivity as well (Auer et al, 2005). Labour market deregulation may affect productivity through its impact on worker motivation and effort, as it erodes social capital and trust in the labour relation Naastepad, 2009, 2012).…”
Section: A Dangerous Obsessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job creation should prioritize sectors in which mobility can generate benefits for the workers, particularly those of lowest incomes. In that regard, the restructuring or design of new programmes could be based, for example, on the "flexi-security" systems or flexibility with security, directly or indirectly adopted by some European countries (Auer, Berg and Coulibaly, 2005;Andersen and Svarer, 2006). For that purpose, the economy needs to operate so as to grant a certain degree of flexibility to firms when planning the size of their labour force according to the business cycle, but with a system of protection or pensions linked to programmes that update vocational training and labour relocation.…”
Section: Determination Of the Differential Between Rich And Poor: Intmentioning
confidence: 99%