2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40626-018-0127-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a reduction in stomatal conductance the main strategy of Garcinia brasiliensis (Clusiaceae) to deal with water stress?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is certainly affected by the arrest of cell growth under enhanced dehydration, leading to the drop of cell water potential and the loss of turgidity (Hsiao, 2003;Simonneau et al, 2017;Turner, 2018). Taken together our results agree with the already established concept that the arrest of cell growth responds to a milder water deficit than that required for a photosynthetic rate reduction (dos Santos Gouvêa and Marenco, 2018;Zhao et al, 2020). Consequently, the limitation of carbon assimilation is not the real cause of cell growth arrest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is certainly affected by the arrest of cell growth under enhanced dehydration, leading to the drop of cell water potential and the loss of turgidity (Hsiao, 2003;Simonneau et al, 2017;Turner, 2018). Taken together our results agree with the already established concept that the arrest of cell growth responds to a milder water deficit than that required for a photosynthetic rate reduction (dos Santos Gouvêa and Marenco, 2018;Zhao et al, 2020). Consequently, the limitation of carbon assimilation is not the real cause of cell growth arrest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In conclusion, Arabidopsis and other plants respond in a similar way to water deficit with a decrease of WC, SC, FW, PLA, and DW and a concomitant increase of sugars and other compatible osmolytes (Mewis et al, 2012;Sperdouli and Moustakas, 2012;dos Santos Gouvêa and Marenco, 2018;Zhao et al, 2020). Although more than 1,000 genes have been identified to be involved in drought response (Seki et al, 2002;Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2007;Lawlor, 2013;Fang and Xiong, 2015), only a few of them have been characterized in terms of induced tolerance to water depletion, combined with enhanced plant productivity in model plants, as well as in important agricultural crops (Skirycz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, some species adapted to arid and semiarid climate regions can reach this value without tissue death, which may be the case of M. tenuiflora plants in this research, since after the resumption of the supply of adequately restored their water status. These results agree with those found in the literature, in Handroanthus impetiginosus (Pessoa et al 2017), Myracrodruon urundeuva (Costa et al, 2015), Hevea brasiliensis (Chen et al, 2010), and Quercus pubecens (Gallé et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This effect can be attributed to the fact that cell division, leaf expansion, and protein synthesis are inhibited by water stress, as water deficit may induce the accumulation of abscisic acid, which promotes changes in gene expression (Kaur & Asthir, 2017;Mittler & Blumwald, 2015). Even in circumstances in which drought stress is not quite severe to cause plant death, it has been found that drought stress may lead to a decrease of leaf area and plant biomass, thus reducing growth (Kaur & Asthir, 2017;Gouvêa & Marenco, 2018;Nóia Júnior et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, under water deficit condition, plants may either avoid transpiration or increase water uptake by often employing a combination of strategies to cope with drought stress (Kaur & Asthir, 2017). Transpiration can be lowered by stomatal closure and increased leaf shading (or reduced leaf area), while osmotic adjustments and an increase of the root/shoot ratio can improve water uptake (Goufo et al, 2017;Kaur & Asthir, 2017;Gouvêa & Marenco, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%