2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0896(00)00148-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a Nitrogen Atom an Important Pharmacophoric Element in Sigma Ligand Binding?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
78
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CoMFA models were derived for activity at both DAT and σ 1 receptors. The comparison of the distances for a template molecule with previously proposed σ receptor models 22,24 showed significant compatibility, suggesting that these rimcazole analogues likely bind using the described pharmacophoric features. The σ 1 receptor model showed common features with the DAT model, providing sites where ligands could be modified to develop and optimize the activity at both targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…CoMFA models were derived for activity at both DAT and σ 1 receptors. The comparison of the distances for a template molecule with previously proposed σ receptor models 22,24 showed significant compatibility, suggesting that these rimcazole analogues likely bind using the described pharmacophoric features. The σ 1 receptor model showed common features with the DAT model, providing sites where ligands could be modified to develop and optimize the activity at both targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although we have previously shown that putative S1R ligands inhibit HCV infection, most of these compounds selectively and efficiently inhibit viral entry (35), a process that is not altered by S1R downregulation (Fig. 7), probably due to their lysosomotropic properties as weak amines, a structural feature that appears to be important for synthetic ligands to bind S1R (72). Thus, in view of the evidence presented in this study and the reported ability of putative S1R ligands to modulate cellular processes in an S1R-independent manner (73), we suspect that the antiviral activity of the putative S1R ligands that prompted this study is not mediated by S1R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…as with piperazine derivatives). To some extent, binding character is not unlike that proposed for σ 1 ligands (Gilligan et al, 1992;Glennon et al, 1994;Ablordeppey et al, 2000); indeed, most compounds bind at both σ receptor subtypes with, frequently, <10-fold selectivity. On the other hand, compounds such as 101-103 suggest that real differences exist -subtle though they may be.…”
Section: Binding Character Of σ σ σ σ σ 2 Receptor Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…That is, this review is based on ligands we reported in a series of articles published over the past 15 years (e.g. Ablordeppey et al, 1991;Ablordeppey et al, 1992a;Ablordeppey et al, 1992b;Ablordeppey et al, 1993;Ablordeppey et al, 1998;Ablordeppey et al, 2000;Ablordeppey et al, 2002;El-Ashmawy et al, 1992;Glennon et al, 1991a;Glennon et al, 1991b;Glennon et al, 1991c;Glennon et al, 1994;Glennon, 2000;Glennon, and Fischer 2000;Glennon et al, 2004); these papers can be consulted for the synthesis and physicochemical properties of most of the compounds described here. Sigma-2 receptor binding data were obtained using guinea pig brain homogenates and the nonselective [ One of the first sigma ligands we reported was R(-)PPAP (5R); the structure might be viewed as an N-phenylpropyl derivative of a ring-opened benzomorphan.…”
Section: Binding Character Of σ σ σ σ σ 2 Receptor Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation