1981
DOI: 10.1126/science.213.4511.967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?

Abstract: The current (synthetic) theory of evolution has been criticized on the grounds that it implies that macroevolutionary processes (speciation and morphological diversification) are gradual. The extent to which macroevolution is gradual or punctuational remains to be ascertained. Macroevolutionary processes are underlain by microevolutionary phenomena and are compatible with the synthetic theory of evolution. But microevolutionary principles are compatible with both gradualism and punctualism; therefore, logicall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sometimes interpreted as contradicting the gradualist theory of evolution (8,82), punctuated patterns of evolutionary change, especially in morphology, are expected under the (gradualist) alternative-adaptation hypothesis. This represents a further step in reconciling these two perhaps only superficially contradictory points of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although sometimes interpreted as contradicting the gradualist theory of evolution (8,82), punctuated patterns of evolutionary change, especially in morphology, are expected under the (gradualist) alternative-adaptation hypothesis. This represents a further step in reconciling these two perhaps only superficially contradictory points of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, a general feeling was that the accumulation of molecular data would lead to an evolution of Modern Synthesis more than to a revolution (Fitch 1982;Stebbins and Ayala 1981). It was also admitted that molecular observations made so far were peripheral to the mechanisms of evolution: only a precise description of the mechanisms of development could open the door to a description of the mechanisms of evolution.…”
Section: The Article In Its Scientific Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unfortunately, neither Gould nor any of the other critics have been able to provide an adequate alternative theory of heredity to explain something like punctuated equilibrium. Mendelism (including its molecular successor) has no place for such jumps or starts (Stebbins and Ayala 1981). Recently, it is the students of embryology, now known as evolutionary development, or evo-devo, who have been trying to break the Darwinian ties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%