2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.72.064610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a global coupled-channel dispersive optical model potential for actinides feasible?

Abstract: An isospin-dependent coupled-channel optical model potential containing a dispersive term with a nonlocal contribution is used to simultaneously fit the available experimental database (including strength functions and scattering radius) for neutron and proton scattering on strongly deformed 238 U and 232 Th nuclei. The energy range 0.001-200 MeV is covered. A dispersive coupled-channel optical model (DCCOM) potential with parameters that show a smooth energy dependence and energy-independent geometry are dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What are the differences in calculated optical-model observables between the present model (PM) and previous works that used either SRM couplings [5,6] or rigid-rotor model (RRM) couplings [10,11]? The main difference between SRM and RRM is the aforementioned coupling of the non-GS vibrational bands with strength proportional to the "effective" deformations derived from the SRM parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What are the differences in calculated optical-model observables between the present model (PM) and previous works that used either SRM couplings [5,6] or rigid-rotor model (RRM) couplings [10,11]? The main difference between SRM and RRM is the aforementioned coupling of the non-GS vibrational bands with strength proportional to the "effective" deformations derived from the SRM parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data for nucleon interaction on 232 Th and 238 U targets coincide with the database used in our previous works [10,11]. A Lane consistent formulation of the generalized optical model [12] is used with dispersive integrals calculated analytically [13,14].…”
Section: Optical Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previously developed isospin-dependent DCCOMP for actinides [3,4] has been shown [7] to be approximately Lane consistent, and described the direct quasi-elastic (p,n) scattering to the IAS of the target nucleus. The corresponding coupling form-factors for the charge-exchange calculations using the dispersive coupled-channel potential were defined in Ref.…”
Section: Lane Consistency Of the Dccomp And Excitations Of The Isobarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed formulation of the dispersive coupled-channel optical model potential was given in previous works [2][3][4]; a brief summary is given in the next Section. We focus in this contribution on the second area of development, namely on improving the model of nuclear structure used in coupledchannel calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore low-lying rotational bands, built on vibrational band-heads for even-even and on single-particle bandheads for odd nuclei, need to be taken into account to describe neutron inelastic scattering on actinides. Authors were not able to find published optical model potentials for neutron scattering on odd actinides, even if many publications described applications to even-even actinides [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] dependent optical model potential for actinides [10][11][12] assuming a rigid rotor coupling of levels in the rotational ground state band. The coupling of vibrational bands improved the description of neutron scattering on even-even actinides in the energy region from 500 keV up to about 3 MeV, which is critical for fast neutron fission reactors, as was discussed at the WONDER 2012 workshop [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%