2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00777.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a five-category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998-2007

Abstract: This five-category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub-classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a 'wait and see' management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] Thus, Theoharis et al 16 studied its diagnostic accuracy on a cohort of more than 3200 thyroid FNAs: 11.1% of the thyroid nodules were deemed unsatisfactory, 73.8% benign, 3% indeterminate (AUS/FLUS), 5.5% follicular neoplasm, 1.3% suspicious for malignancy, and 5.2% positive for malignancy, supporting the use of the 6-tier diagnostic approach. Although it has been argued that the AUS/FLUS category should be better defined to avoid becoming a "waste basket" diagnostic category, [19][20][21] we feel that its judicious use meets the needs advocated by the Bethesda system. 12,18 Obviously, standardized reporting with specific categories should not be intended as a substitute for the interpretation of cytologic data, since numbers alone cannot and should not be used to replace a diagnostic analysis or to reduce the need for clinicopathologic correlation.…”
Section: Preoperative Thyroid Cytologymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[16][17][18] Thus, Theoharis et al 16 studied its diagnostic accuracy on a cohort of more than 3200 thyroid FNAs: 11.1% of the thyroid nodules were deemed unsatisfactory, 73.8% benign, 3% indeterminate (AUS/FLUS), 5.5% follicular neoplasm, 1.3% suspicious for malignancy, and 5.2% positive for malignancy, supporting the use of the 6-tier diagnostic approach. Although it has been argued that the AUS/FLUS category should be better defined to avoid becoming a "waste basket" diagnostic category, [19][20][21] we feel that its judicious use meets the needs advocated by the Bethesda system. 12,18 Obviously, standardized reporting with specific categories should not be intended as a substitute for the interpretation of cytologic data, since numbers alone cannot and should not be used to replace a diagnostic analysis or to reduce the need for clinicopathologic correlation.…”
Section: Preoperative Thyroid Cytologymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Transient hyperthyroidism and late hypothyroidism are likewise rare (103). No pathological changes have been found in tissue adjacent to the ablated area in patients who subsequently underwent surgery (95,106). The low risk of major complications (about 1%) and the high tolerability of LAT have been confirmed in a recent multicentre study (105).…”
Section: Laser Ablationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some cytopathology experts claim that they can safely render indeterminate diagnoses much less often, but considering the potentially high number of false negative results (missed cancers) in operated cytologically benign nodules (4,17,18), there may be significant risk with very low cytology indeterminate rates, assuming the rate is lowered by moving many of these samples to the benign cytology category (24). Classification systems with one indeterminate cytology category have postulated that subdividing this category into subcategories at higher and lower risk could improve clinical care (25,26). The Bethesda system created three indeterminate categories: atypia or follicu-multicenter clinical trials investigating immunohistochemical markers are lacking (34).…”
Section: Application Of Immunohistochemistry To Fna Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%