2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a fiber post better than a metal post for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cast metal alloy posts and zirconia posts-which have much higher elastic moduli than dentin-generate concentrated stress at the root, which may result in the fracture of the root, while the posts remain intact [62,63]. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts exhibit more balanced stress distribution, and while the risk of root fracture is lower, the posts are more easily fractured [64]. Nevertheless, because of their excellent mechanical behavior, FRC posts have become the most commonly used material for post-and-core restoration, although there are still some disadvantages.…”
Section: Post-and-corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cast metal alloy posts and zirconia posts-which have much higher elastic moduli than dentin-generate concentrated stress at the root, which may result in the fracture of the root, while the posts remain intact [62,63]. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts exhibit more balanced stress distribution, and while the risk of root fracture is lower, the posts are more easily fractured [64]. Nevertheless, because of their excellent mechanical behavior, FRC posts have become the most commonly used material for post-and-core restoration, although there are still some disadvantages.…”
Section: Post-and-corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In teeth with round root canals, the use of prefabricated, conically shaped and adhesively luted root canal posts, ideally without further post space preparation, is recommended (Figure 8). Up to now, there is no clinical evidence that the post material's rigidity affects the survival of root filled teeth or the occurrence of root fractures (Figueiredo et al, 2015;Martins et al, 2021). Outcome data for post-retained restorations varies with respect to F I G U R E 8 Zirconia crown (Lava; 3M ESPE AG) replacement following root canal retreatment 21 (a-c) preoperative buccal views and long-cone periapical radiograph (d-f) removal of cast post and root canal retreatment (h-j) internal bleaching followed by fibre post, composite core placement and thereafter, crown preparation (k) completed crown cementation (l) radiographic follow-up at 3 years.…”
Section: Postsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restoration of immature incisors with the use of flowable fiber-reinforced post-core composites displayed promising performance in a matter of fatigue-resistance and survival [ 8 ]. Martins et al [ 9 ] systematically reviewed ten studies regarding the evidences about the failure rates of endodontically treated teeth restored with intraradicular metal posts or fiber posts and found out no difference for failure rates between metal posts and fiber posts [ 9 ]. Various posts have been used to rehabilitate structurally compromised immature teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%