2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a cannibal different from its conspecifics? A behavioural, morphological, muscular and retinal structure study with pikeperch juveniles under farming conditions

Abstract: Is a cannibal different from its conspecifics? A behavioural, morphological, muscular and retinal structure study with pikeperch juveniles under farming conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They corresponded to dead fish or fish that were not found at the end of the experiment for pikeperch. The loss of individuals could be linked to cases of cannibalism, a common behaviour for this species [53] and observed twice in our experiment. For the sterlet, the mortality rates were mainly explained by fish reaching the limit point defined in the study (FCF less than 0.27), which refers to lean fish and are thus out of the experimental protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They corresponded to dead fish or fish that were not found at the end of the experiment for pikeperch. The loss of individuals could be linked to cases of cannibalism, a common behaviour for this species [53] and observed twice in our experiment. For the sterlet, the mortality rates were mainly explained by fish reaching the limit point defined in the study (FCF less than 0.27), which refers to lean fish and are thus out of the experimental protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Species that have a predestined predatory nature and can do cannibalism are Arachnoidea. The Arachnoidea, the most extreme types of predators practicing cannibalism are the Latrodectus genus and Thomisidae [19] [20]. The monotonic function used in the Holling Type I response function is simple and has many species that match the characteristics of this type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%