2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is 3D MPRAGE better than the combination DIR/PSIR for cortical lesion detection at 3T MRI?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible critical point for CLs detection could be the lack of availability of DIR sequence in peripheral clinical centers and the moderate sensitivity of this sequence, as radiological and pathological comparison estimated an overall sensitivity of 17.1% . To overcome this issue, alternative sequences, such as phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), DIR/PSIR combination, and MPRAGE, have been proposed. However, a standardized protocol for such an assessment is still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible critical point for CLs detection could be the lack of availability of DIR sequence in peripheral clinical centers and the moderate sensitivity of this sequence, as radiological and pathological comparison estimated an overall sensitivity of 17.1% . To overcome this issue, alternative sequences, such as phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), DIR/PSIR combination, and MPRAGE, have been proposed. However, a standardized protocol for such an assessment is still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining different sequences, as performed for the criterion standard, was subjectively the preferred approach by the raters in the current study to accurately delineate cortical involvement, which supports previously proposed multimodal reading protocol approaches. 4,[29][30][31] Synthetic MR imaging has previously been shown to provide proton-density-, T1-, and T2-weightings in diagnostic quality (as illustrated in the On-line Figure) [13][14][15] as well as automatic volumetrics, 13 with a single acquisition. The image quality of synthetic FLAIR images has, however, been shown to be hampered by artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of sample size and the restricted range of employment impairment, there may have been limited power to detect the full extent of MRI relationships. It would be of interest for future studies to test whether other aspects of MRI-defined involvement in MS, such as spinal cord [ 36 41 ], cortical [ 42 , 43 ], and diffuse cerebral damage [ 44 46 ], are related to productivity and whether MRI findings predict longitudinal change of employment status. Destructive effects of lesions may be particularly prominent using ultra-high-field strength MRI [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%