2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0866-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is 16-frame really superior to 8-frame gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction? Comparison of two simultaneously acquired gated SPECT studies

Abstract: Comparing two simultaneously acquired studies, the use of 16 instead of 8 frames has minor and predictable influence on functional data. Furthermore, there are no differences in the detection of stress-induced functional changes. The advantage of 16 over 8 frames in the daily clinical practice appears questionable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A phantom study did not demonstrate a clear superiority of a 16-frame acquisition over an 8-frame acquisition, with a similar underestimation of the LV volumes and a slight overestimation of the LVEF with the 16-frame solution (21). Moreover, a recent study comparing the quantitative data obtained with the QGS program from the 2 framing solutions (8 frames and 16 frames) acquired simultaneously showed only minor differences of questionable clinical value (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phantom study did not demonstrate a clear superiority of a 16-frame acquisition over an 8-frame acquisition, with a similar underestimation of the LV volumes and a slight overestimation of the LVEF with the 16-frame solution (21). Moreover, a recent study comparing the quantitative data obtained with the QGS program from the 2 framing solutions (8 frames and 16 frames) acquired simultaneously showed only minor differences of questionable clinical value (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not perform any arrhythmia rejection and therefore we cannot exclude that transient rhythm disturbances during the acquisition could have influenced the EF calculation. However, previous data indicate that the influence of arrhythmia rejection on the functional parameters derived from gated SPECT is limited [21]. Because we adopted a relatively low threshold for classifying the EF response as abnormal, the gated SPECT reproducibility is a major issue.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using eight intervals instead of 16, does lead to lower ejection fractions, as measured by QGS, because this smoothens the time-volume curve, with an average reduction of 3.71 percentage points [6]. However, the use of fewer intervals has only minor and predictable influences on functional data [16] and therefore is not a source of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%