2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is 10-second electrocardiogram recording enough for accurately estimating heart rate in atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one study showed that estimated HRs based on ECGs significantly changed according to the length of ECG recording. 24 In the present study, HRs were evaluated only at 4 time points, which may have been insufficient to capture precise data. We also did not collect data on HR after discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, one study showed that estimated HRs based on ECGs significantly changed according to the length of ECG recording. 24 In the present study, HRs were evaluated only at 4 time points, which may have been insufficient to capture precise data. We also did not collect data on HR after discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our ventricular ECG parameters were derived from the one-time 10-s ECG recording. Previous studies have shown that the ECG parameters from the single 10-s ECG are less accurate in reflecting the cardiac conditions compared to those from the multiple 10-s ECG or 5-min ECG recording, especially in people with cardiovascular disorders (e.g., atrial fibrillation) [44,45]. Third, despite the adjustment for a range of potential confounders, our results might still be affected by residual confounding due to imperfect assessments of some confounders (e.g., self-reported lifestyle factors and arrhythmia that may not be accurately detected by self-reported history and the 10-s ECG recording).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the dynamics of HR during the block, we divided the entire duration of each experimental block into 50 segments, each lasting at least 10 s (with a mean duration ranging from 10.0 to 11.2 s, mean 10.41 ± 0.3 s). This division was based on previous research findings that suggested a 10‐s electrocardiogram recording was sufficient for accurate HR estimation (Shuai, 2016). Subsequently, fragments with a duration of at least 10 s were named “time units.” The first baseline condition was averaged and analyzed as a single value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%