2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04289.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRTA1 is selectively expressed in nodal and extranodal marginal zone lymphomas

Abstract: Falini B, Agostinelli C, Bigerna B, Pucciarini A, Pacini R, Tabarrini A, Falcinelli F, Piccioli M, Paulli M, Gambacorta M, Ponzoni M, Tiacci E, Ascani S, Martelli M P, Dalla Favera R, Stein H & Pileri S A 
(2012) Histopathology 61, 930–941 IRTA1 is selectively expressed in nodal and extranodal marginal zone lymphomas Aims:  The aim of this study was to search for a molecule selectively expressed by marginal zone (MZ) lymphomas (MZLs), whose diagnosis is currently based on morphological criteria and negativity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(66 reference statements)
3
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…73 In a similar way, immunoglobulin superfamily receptor translocation-associated 1 (IRTA1) was shown to be expressed on marginal zone and monocytoid B cells, 74 and also subsequently on MZLs. 75 In the latter study, 73% of NMZLs were IRTA1-positive in contrast to none of 320 FLs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…73 In a similar way, immunoglobulin superfamily receptor translocation-associated 1 (IRTA1) was shown to be expressed on marginal zone and monocytoid B cells, 74 and also subsequently on MZLs. 75 In the latter study, 73% of NMZLs were IRTA1-positive in contrast to none of 320 FLs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…IRTA1 positivity, reported on the neoplastic cells in cases of extranodal MZL (EMZL), is barely present in SMZL. 22 …”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Finally, secondary splenic localization of EMZL presents a pattern that overlaps with that of SMZL, but clinical dissemination is crucial for differentiation. Splenic involvement virtually excludes a diagnosis of nodal MZL; apart from the differential expression of IRTA1, which is negative in SMZL, 11,22 clinical correlation is critical for reaching a correct diagnosis when dealing with a BM biopsy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Among MZL, only EMZL of the MALT represents a well-defined entity in terms of clinicopathologic presentation, genetics, and treatment. Conversely, the lack of typical markers, with the exception of IRTA1 expression in a fraction of NMZL, 2,3 and the absence of clear consensus criteria for diagnosis, make the pathologic classification of NMZL and SMZL difficult, laborious, and not easily reproducible. 4 NMZL and SMZL share similar morphology and phenotype and are distinguished solely by the different pattern of dissemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%