Irrigation scheduling research: South African experiences and future prospects

Abstract

Many scheduling approaches have been developed with Water Research Commission funding over the past 4 decades and deployed with varying levels of success; 2 approaches have won prestigious international awards. Soil-based approaches which include measurement of matric potential (tensiometry), water content (neutron probes, capacitance sensors) and depth of wetting (wetting front detectors) have been relatively well accepted by farmers. Atmospheric-based approaches apply, through biophysical modelling of the soil-crop-atmosphere system, thermodynamic limits to the amount of water that can evaporate from a cropped surface under particular environmental conditions. Modelling approaches have been quite empirical or somewhat more mechanistic, generic or crop specific, with pre-programmed (e.g. irrigation calendars) or real-time output. Novel mechanisms have been developed to deliver recommendations to farmers, including resource-poor irrigators. Although general adoption of objective irrigation scheduling in South Africa is still low, the high cost of electricity and nitrogen, and scarcity of water is reviving the interest of consultants and irrigators in the application of these tools to use water more efficiently. Where adoption has been relatively high, intensive support and farmer-researcher-consultant interactions have been key contributing factors. We propose 4 avenues in the R&D domain to ensure responsible water utilisation. Firstly, there is a need to continue to advance existing soil-water measurement technology; and secondly, to further develop new and emerging technologies, like the use of remote sensing. Thirdly, the user-friendliness should be improved as should systems that support existing scheduling tools; and finally, we need to appreciate that farmers are intuitively adaptive managers, and we need to develop simple monitoring tools and conceptual frameworks that enable structured learning.

African Leafy Vegetables: A Review of Status, Production and Utilization in South Africa

“…According to Annandale et al [61], in the next two to three decades, water availability is likely to drop below benchmark of 1000 m 3 person year −1 . One way to deal with inadequate availability of water is to utilise crops that are tolerant to water stress [6].…”

Estimating Water Footprints of Vegetable Crops: Influence of Growing Season, Solar Radiation Data and Functional Unit

“…Wind speed is assumed to be 2 m·s −1 , solar radiation is estimated based on latitude and temperature, and humidity is estimated based on minimum temperatures [28,29]. The SWB model was considered the most appropriate model for this application, because it can simulate growth of a range of different crops, it is able to simulate daily crop water use, has been extensively tested and applied in South Africa, and is relatively simple to use [28,[30][31][32][33]. Soil input data used to parameterise and calibrate the SWB model included soil texture and matric potential at full capacity and permanent wilting point (kPa), a drainage factor (0 to 1) and drainage rate (mm·day −1 ) and maximum rooting depth.…”

Quantifying the Impact of Off-Road Driving on Root-Area Distribution in Soils

“…Field-determined field capacity, or the 'drained upper limit' (DUL), was used as the upper limit of water held by the soil (see Cassel et al, 1983;Annandale et al, 2011). Soil water content at field capacity for the study site was thus determined by initially wetting the soil to saturation and allowing the water to drain to a constant mass (negligible drainage rate).…”