2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation scheduling performance by evapotranspiration-based controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaporation losses can be minimized by 50% when the soil is kept at saturation under leveled field conditions. Higher the transpiration higher the yield (a normal crop of 4.5t/ha (tones/hectare) with an irrigation period of 100 days consumes 6 mm/day by transpiration [6]. 1.4 mm/day the yield decreases to 1t/ha when it increases 10.5mm the yield of crop will be increased upto 7.5 t/ha).…”
Section: Advantages Of Proper Watering For Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporation losses can be minimized by 50% when the soil is kept at saturation under leveled field conditions. Higher the transpiration higher the yield (a normal crop of 4.5t/ha (tones/hectare) with an irrigation period of 100 days consumes 6 mm/day by transpiration [6]. 1.4 mm/day the yield decreases to 1t/ha when it increases 10.5mm the yield of crop will be increased upto 7.5 t/ha).…”
Section: Advantages Of Proper Watering For Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stand alone controllers measure climatic variables (temperature and solar radiation) on site and then determine a cumulative daily ET value. Signal based controllers receive ET data from a wireless connection while historical ET controllers rely on historical ET information for the area (Davis and Dukes, 2010). Three ET controllers evaluated in southwest Florida by Davis et al (2009) reported an averaged water savings of 43% over time-based irrigation without a rain sensor.…”
Section: Precision Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three ET controllers evaluated in southwest Florida by Davis et al (2009) reported an averaged water savings of 43% over time-based irrigation without a rain sensor. Davis and Dukes (2010) reported that properly programmed ET controllers are more effective than manual irrigation scheduling because they can adjust to real-time weather and minimize over-watering.…”
Section: Precision Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Systems based on ET have been developed that allow water savings of up to 42% on timebased irrigation schedule [3]. An electromagnetic sensor to measure soil moisture was the basis for developing an irrigation system at a savings of 53% of water compared with irrigation by sprinklers in an area of 1000m 2 of pasture [4]. A reduction in water use under scheduled systems also have been achieved, using soil sensor and an evaporimeter, which allowed for the adjustment of irrigation to the daily fluctuations in weather or volumetric substrate moisture content [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%