2023
DOI: 10.22541/essoar.167590826.62059121/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation quantification through backscatter data assimilation with a buddy check approach

Abstract: Irrigation is an important component of the terrestrial water cycle, but it is often poorly accounted for in models. Recent studies have attempted to integrate satellite data and land surface models via data assimilation (DA) to (1) detect and quantify irrigation, and (2) better model the related land surface variables such as soil moisture, vegetation, and evapotranspiration. In this study, different synthetic DA experiments are tested to advance satellite DA for the estimation of irrigation. We assimilate sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new method implemented in the Land Information System version 7.3 will is available on GitHub via https:// github.com/lbusschaert/LISF_buddy_check. The main input and output of the synthetic experiments are stored in a Zenodo data repository (Busschaert et al, 2023). The LIS parameters and source code are freely available at https://lis.gsfc.nasa.gov/ and https://github.com/NASA-LIS/LISF.…”
Section: Appendix B: Nic For the Different Sites Under Mild Model Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new method implemented in the Land Information System version 7.3 will is available on GitHub via https:// github.com/lbusschaert/LISF_buddy_check. The main input and output of the synthetic experiments are stored in a Zenodo data repository (Busschaert et al, 2023). The LIS parameters and source code are freely available at https://lis.gsfc.nasa.gov/ and https://github.com/NASA-LIS/LISF.…”
Section: Appendix B: Nic For the Different Sites Under Mild Model Errormentioning
confidence: 99%