2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-019-00619-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation distribution uniformity analysis on a lateral-move irrigation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the abovementioned CU–DU linear relationship, the slope coefficient represents the ratio between half of the difference ( S l /2) of the difference between the sprinkler water depth and the mean value of the sprinkler water amount at each radial point and the water deviation ( m ) of the low value of the N /4 sprinkler water amount and the mean value of the sprinkler water amount. Evidently, the value of the slope coefficient is related to the actual sprinkler water distribution characteristics of the sprinklers, and many factors, such as the sprinkler type, working pressure, combination spacing, wind speed and wind direction, affect the actual sprinkler water distribution characteristics of the sprinklers (Faria et al, 2019; Mateos, 1998; Wąsik et al, 2018), which also explains why the CU and DU relationship equations had different slope coefficients in previous studies. The plots of the linear regression relationship between DU and CU, as well as the deviation relationship between DU and CU by Seniwongse and Reynolds (1972), Keller and Bliesner (1990), Jiusheng et al (1998), among others, are shown in Figure 2, where the deviation relationship is expressed as the relative deviation rate ζ (Equation ), and the relative deviation explains the relative distance between the two and objectively describes the gap between them.…”
Section: Effect Of the Slope Coefficient On The Numerical Relationshi...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the abovementioned CU–DU linear relationship, the slope coefficient represents the ratio between half of the difference ( S l /2) of the difference between the sprinkler water depth and the mean value of the sprinkler water amount at each radial point and the water deviation ( m ) of the low value of the N /4 sprinkler water amount and the mean value of the sprinkler water amount. Evidently, the value of the slope coefficient is related to the actual sprinkler water distribution characteristics of the sprinklers, and many factors, such as the sprinkler type, working pressure, combination spacing, wind speed and wind direction, affect the actual sprinkler water distribution characteristics of the sprinklers (Faria et al, 2019; Mateos, 1998; Wąsik et al, 2018), which also explains why the CU and DU relationship equations had different slope coefficients in previous studies. The plots of the linear regression relationship between DU and CU, as well as the deviation relationship between DU and CU by Seniwongse and Reynolds (1972), Keller and Bliesner (1990), Jiusheng et al (1998), among others, are shown in Figure 2, where the deviation relationship is expressed as the relative deviation rate ζ (Equation ), and the relative deviation explains the relative distance between the two and objectively describes the gap between them.…”
Section: Effect Of the Slope Coefficient On The Numerical Relationshi...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This indicates how evenly the water is distributed over the field. A high uniformity value implies that the applied water depth is similar across different parts of the field (Faria et al, 2019). The data in Table ( 5) displays the degrees of homogeneity for various irrigation techniques.…”
Section: Uniformity Coefficient Of Applied Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform distribution has been a useful tool for describing the distribution of some water-related elements such as irrigated water depth 39 and daily streamflow 40 . Given the rapid development of the agricultural industry and population growth, data for the first three years of the forecasted years were used for the historical data analysis.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%