2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation demand and supply, given projections of climate and land-use change, in Yolo County, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although human water use still accounts for a small proportion of total water on and below the surface (see Oki and Kanae, 2006), total human withdrawals currently include around 26 % of terrestrial evaporation and 54 % of the accessible surface runoff that is geographically and temporally available (Postel et al, 1996). There are already major water scarcity issues across highly populated regions of the globe (e.g., Falkenmark, 2013;Schiermeier, 2014), which raise fundamental concerns about how future demand should be supplied, particularly considering climate change (e.g., Arnell, 1999Arnell, , 2004Tao et al, 2003;Döll, 2009;Taylor et al, 2013; Hanasaki et al, 2013a, b;Wada et al, 2013;Milano et al, 2013;Mehta et al, 2013;Schewe et al, 2014). Such important threats to water security necessitate a detailed understanding of water availability and demand in time and space; and therefore largescale models are required for impact assessments.…”
Section: Modeling Human-water Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although human water use still accounts for a small proportion of total water on and below the surface (see Oki and Kanae, 2006), total human withdrawals currently include around 26 % of terrestrial evaporation and 54 % of the accessible surface runoff that is geographically and temporally available (Postel et al, 1996). There are already major water scarcity issues across highly populated regions of the globe (e.g., Falkenmark, 2013;Schiermeier, 2014), which raise fundamental concerns about how future demand should be supplied, particularly considering climate change (e.g., Arnell, 1999Arnell, , 2004Tao et al, 2003;Döll, 2009;Taylor et al, 2013; Hanasaki et al, 2013a, b;Wada et al, 2013;Milano et al, 2013;Mehta et al, 2013;Schewe et al, 2014). Such important threats to water security necessitate a detailed understanding of water availability and demand in time and space; and therefore largescale models are required for impact assessments.…”
Section: Modeling Human-water Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It combines bio-physical factors influencing the water runoff, such as climate, groundwater hydrology, and land cover with socioeconomic factors such as land use, infrastructure, and water management priorities [17,20]. WEAP has been successfully used for the simulation of climate, land use, and population growth changes [18,19,29].…”
Section: Weapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though predicted changes in the total amount of precipitation are currently equivocal, modeling studies consistently show that climate change will significantly increase potential evapotranspiration in California's specialty crop growing regions, and that changing irrigation practices can partly but not wholly compensate (Purkey et al 2008;Joyce et al 2011;Mehta et al 2013). These analyses generally use a high degree of aggregation (e.g., grouping all annual crops together), so the effect of changes in water supply and demand for each particular crop remain to be explored in more detail.…”
Section: Previous Work On Specialty Crops and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%