2022
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.2008025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreversible electroporation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It raises the discussion of additional ablation, which could be provided by replacing the needle or by inserting a second or even a third needle to better control the thermoablation area. Irreversible Electroporation [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasounds [ 39 , 40 ] are alternative ablation techniques for such lesions, their efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in many studies especially for colorectal liver metastases treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It raises the discussion of additional ablation, which could be provided by replacing the needle or by inserting a second or even a third needle to better control the thermoablation area. Irreversible Electroporation [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasounds [ 39 , 40 ] are alternative ablation techniques for such lesions, their efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in many studies especially for colorectal liver metastases treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger size of the lesion to treat and proximity to blood vessels (especially hepatic veins) are risk factors for local recurrence that need to be considered when deciding on the ablation strategy, by adjusting the number of needles and the heating parameters to the lesion to treat or by taking a different approach with non-thermal ablations. Thermoablation of local recurrence occurring at a previous thermoablation site should be reserved for specific situations, since there is a higher risk of further local recurrence, given the almost identical primary and secondary efficacy rates, and this should also be balanced with alternative ablation techniques (IRE, HIFU) [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 ]. A non-ovoid thermoablation site shape on routine control imaging should prompt consideration of an early additional thermoablation procedure given the likelihood of a suboptimal distribution of the heat and the risk of a subsequent local recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of IRE within 1.0 cm from critical structures is evident. Additionally, the procedure is efficacious even for tumours abutting or encasing large high-flow vascular structures such as the portal vein and hepatic arteries [ 83 , 84 ]. Other typical applications of IRE are tumour ablation near bile ducts, the gallbladder, or the bowel [ 85 , 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Irreversible Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 108 Although IRE has proportionally most limited data regarding treatment outcomes, it is a modality that has a niche application, with outcomes to date suggesting similar outcomes to standard thermal ablative techniques. 109 Regardless of the modality used, careful patient selection and application of technique are crucial to effective outcomes. Achieving a suitable ablation margin of at least 5–10 mm has also been shown to correlate with more effective tumor control and recurrence-free intervals.…”
Section: Clinical Progress In Crlmmentioning
confidence: 99%