The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429476259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreverence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…“Holding ideas lightly” thus represents a shorthand description of a number of concepts across different dialogical approaches. However, “holding ideas lightly” is also consistent with post‐Milan family therapy where the concept of “irreverence” – that therapists must stay dis‐loyal and “not fall in love” with their hypothesis (Cecchin et al, 1992) – has been promoted as a way to encourage therapists' curiosity and to mitigate potential negative effects of unhelpful, and potentially violent, hypothesizing. “Holding ideas lightly” may thus represent a moral position held by participants that is not restricted to only dialogical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…“Holding ideas lightly” thus represents a shorthand description of a number of concepts across different dialogical approaches. However, “holding ideas lightly” is also consistent with post‐Milan family therapy where the concept of “irreverence” – that therapists must stay dis‐loyal and “not fall in love” with their hypothesis (Cecchin et al, 1992) – has been promoted as a way to encourage therapists' curiosity and to mitigate potential negative effects of unhelpful, and potentially violent, hypothesizing. “Holding ideas lightly” may thus represent a moral position held by participants that is not restricted to only dialogical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is possible that other perspectives on dialogical practices, situated in different social contexts, would profit from alternative and supplementing theories that would strengthen therapists’ and researchers’ “irreverence” (Cecchin, Lane, & Ray, 1992) towards dominant ideas. By adopting a social equity lens and alternative theory beyond polyphony, we hope to invite future research that applies different lenses through which to examine dialogical processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%