2009
DOI: 10.1515/libr.2009.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreparable Damage: Violence, Ownership, and Voice in an Indian Archive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another difficulty in using the archive has been the very implication of the archive in constituting the colonial encounter. That archives in India have largely been a product of colonial intervention is a widely recognised fact (Prasad, 1978;Caswell, 2009). Pursuant to 390 QROM 15,3 the orientalist paradigm, archives valourised certain kinds of writings (such as those of elites and Sanskrit) and practices, whilst ignoring others and they were coloured by the colonial agenda of extraction and control (Caswell, 2009;Mani, 1998;Niranjana, 1992).…”
Section: Limitations or Research Question As What Is Feasiblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another difficulty in using the archive has been the very implication of the archive in constituting the colonial encounter. That archives in India have largely been a product of colonial intervention is a widely recognised fact (Prasad, 1978;Caswell, 2009). Pursuant to 390 QROM 15,3 the orientalist paradigm, archives valourised certain kinds of writings (such as those of elites and Sanskrit) and practices, whilst ignoring others and they were coloured by the colonial agenda of extraction and control (Caswell, 2009;Mani, 1998;Niranjana, 1992).…”
Section: Limitations or Research Question As What Is Feasiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That archives in India have largely been a product of colonial intervention is a widely recognised fact (Prasad, 1978;Caswell, 2009). Pursuant to 390 QROM 15,3 the orientalist paradigm, archives valourised certain kinds of writings (such as those of elites and Sanskrit) and practices, whilst ignoring others and they were coloured by the colonial agenda of extraction and control (Caswell, 2009;Mani, 1998;Niranjana, 1992). For instance, descriptions of practices of Bombay mills in colonial writings repeatedly attribute laziness and inefficiency to the workers and management.…”
Section: Limitations or Research Question As What Is Feasiblementioning
confidence: 99%