2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(02)00090-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irregularity index: A new border irregularity measure for cutaneous melanocytic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the discrimination, the contribution to the correct classification for each feature is evaluated [7]. Given a sample set of skin lesions with manually labeled classes w 1 and w 2 , representing benign moles and malignant melanomas respectively, the probability distributions ( ) .…”
Section: Performance Based Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the discrimination, the contribution to the correct classification for each feature is evaluated [7]. Given a sample set of skin lesions with manually labeled classes w 1 and w 2 , representing benign moles and malignant melanomas respectively, the probability distributions ( ) .…”
Section: Performance Based Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous decade, there have been many studies concerning the boundary irregularity of lesions using both geometric [7,8,9,10] and local fractal [11] measures. There are two types of irregularities found on boundaries: textual and structural, these correspond to fine changes and obvious convex and concave features respectively [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the length of the array should be one less than the maximum possible depth of the tree which is defined in the loop termination conditions. Other features such as border irregularity index [10] can be extracted and used instead of CI; however, their time cost is higher than calculating CI.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%