2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00070-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irregular structural networks of gray matter in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroimaging is one of the most important techniques for exploring T2DM-CD. Gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) are two sensitive markers in neuroimaging studies, which indicate the changes in brain structure caused by T2DM [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroimaging is one of the most important techniques for exploring T2DM-CD. Gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) are two sensitive markers in neuroimaging studies, which indicate the changes in brain structure caused by T2DM [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies either focused on the voxel‐by‐voxel statistical comparisons (Chen et al, 2014; Cui et al, 2014; Cui et al, 2015) or limited the scope in certain predefined brain regions/subnetworks, despite the structural studies suggesting unspecific and widespread alterations (Moran et al, 2013; Schmidt et al, 2004). While network neuroscience studies with complex network analysis indicated that T2DM patients had reduced efficiency in the whole‐brain structural connectivity network (Zhang et al, 2014) and the gray matter co‐variation network (Cao et al, 2019) compared to healthy controls (HCs), none of them reported if such a pattern also looks alike in the whole‐brain functional networks in T2DM and whether the affected connections are associated with T2DM‐induced cognitive impairment. In this study, we assumed that, due to the widespread and systemic effect caused by T2DM, T2DM‐CI could cause widely distributed brain functional dis‐concordance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cao et al, 31 each brain was divided into 90 cortical and subcortical regions of interest (ROI), excluding the cerebellum, using the automatic anatomical labeling (AAL) template. The average volume of each ROI was extracted from the GM map generated by VBM.…”
Section: Construction Of the Structural Covariance Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%